Friday, April 19, 2024
06:01 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Off Topic Section > General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests

General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests A zone where General Knowledge related to this exam can be shared.Surveys and Threads with polls and questions that require answers can be Posted here

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Friday, July 26, 2013
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Lahore
Posts: 22
Thanks: 14
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
ayesha78 is on a distinguished road
Default Difference between Viceroy and Governor General

What is the actual difference between governor general and viceroy? Both are the representatives of the crown. Do they differ in the use of British power or in their regal rank?

Currently all the Commonwealth realms have governor general as the representative of the monarch. So how it came to an end of the Viceroy terminology?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Friday, July 26, 2013
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,549
Thanks: 618
Thanked 1,122 Times in 674 Posts
mhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ayesha78 View Post
What is the actual difference between governor general and viceroy? Both are the representatives of the crown. Do they differ in the use of British power or in their regal rank?

Currently all the Commonwealth realms have governor general as the representative of the monarch. So how it came to an end of the Viceroy terminology?
A "Governor General" is simply "Governor of high rank", while a "Viceroy" is "Governor of a country or province who rules as the representative of his or her king or sovereign". East India Company used to appoint "Governor Generals" to govern Indian territory under their control, however India became a direct subject of British crown after 1858 war and the nomenclature of the office changed into "Viceroy and Governor General of India". All current Commonwealth Realm countries are not direct subjects of the British crown
__________________
The precondition for existence of a higher humanity is not the state, but the nation possessing the necessary ability.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to mhmmdkashif For This Useful Post:
adeel abdullah (Friday, July 26, 2013), ayesha78 (Friday, July 26, 2013), mysterious me (Friday, July 26, 2013), sabahatbhutta (Friday, July 26, 2013)
  #3  
Old Tuesday, July 30, 2013
sohail yousafzai's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 143
Thanks: 16
Thanked 48 Times in 39 Posts
sohail yousafzai is on a distinguished road
Default

But still after the introduction of viceroy in 1858 the term governor general had been used alongwith viceroy till 1947. Then what is the difference?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Lahore
Posts: 22
Thanks: 14
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
ayesha78 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sohail yousafzai View Post
But still after the introduction of viceroy in 1858 the term governor general had been used alongwith viceroy till 1947. Then what is the difference?
Yes, i have the same question. What is the actual difference between these two ranks? Nowadays, Commonwealth realms use the term "governor general" after the queen as monarch. Why they don't use the term Viceroy now, even if the are not their direct subjects?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,549
Thanks: 618
Thanked 1,122 Times in 674 Posts
mhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud of
Default

I think it is clearly apprised that the title 'Viceroy' was added to 'Governor General' after the crown took the reigns of India in its own hands after 1858, it was indirectly subject to the crown earlier since a British Trading Company was ruling it, not the crown. The office of the 'Governor General' was established by the company thus the incumbent was not appointed by the Crown and was only 'Governor General', lateron the incumbents were appointed by the Crown thus "Viceroy and Governor General"

Quote:
Originally Posted by ayesha78 View Post
Yes, i have the same question. What is the actual difference between these two ranks? Nowadays, Commonwealth realms use the term "governor general" after the queen as monarch. Why they don't use the term Viceroy now, even if the are not their direct subjects?
Governor General is an executive office performing functions of the level of Head of State and/or Head of Government.
Viceroy is a Governor who rules as representative of his/her Sovereign.

Viceroy was a style added to the title of the office of Governor General of India for a few reasons. One reason has been explained already, the other reason was many princely states in India were outside direct British rule and had Monarchs of their own who would form relationship not with the British government but with the British Monarch directly. So, as representative of the Monarch, a Viceroy could now deal with them .

Presently the Governor Generals, as well as Governors and Lieutenant Governors, appointed by the Queen in Commonwealth Realm countries are also Viceroys, however the term is not used in their styles.
__________________
The precondition for existence of a higher humanity is not the state, but the nation possessing the necessary ability.

Last edited by Arain007; Wednesday, July 31, 2013 at 12:05 PM. Reason: merged
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Thursday, November 14, 2013
daniyalahmed's Avatar
43rd CTP (PSP)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2014 - Merit 27
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Lahore, Pakistan
Posts: 116
Thanks: 62
Thanked 264 Times in 87 Posts
daniyalahmed is on a distinguished road
Default

wrong!

Governors were appointed by the English East India Company, which was a private entity, did not have any control by the KING / QUEEN or SOVEREIGN.

VICEROY IS SENT ON BEHALF OF THE QUEEN. HE RULES AS AN AGENT OF QUEEN, PROTECTS HER INTERESTS etc.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to daniyalahmed For This Useful Post:
idealsome (Saturday, November 16, 2013)
  #7  
Old Thursday, November 14, 2013
Shooting Star's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: Best Moderator Award: Awarded for censoring all swearing and keeping posts in order. - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: City of Cockroaches & Bureaucrats
Posts: 1,580
Thanks: 2,868
Thanked 2,347 Times in 1,010 Posts
Shooting Star has much to be proud ofShooting Star has much to be proud ofShooting Star has much to be proud ofShooting Star has much to be proud ofShooting Star has much to be proud ofShooting Star has much to be proud ofShooting Star has much to be proud ofShooting Star has much to be proud ofShooting Star has much to be proud ofShooting Star has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daniyalahmed View Post
wrong!

Governors were appointed by the English East India Company, which was a private entity, did not have any control by the KING / QUEEN or SOVEREIGN.

VICEROY IS SENT ON BEHALF OF THE QUEEN. HE RULES AS AN AGENT OF QUEEN, PROTECTS HER INTERESTS etc.
Users should not post a topic/reply in CAPITALS, the reason being is that this is considered as shouting.
Forum Rules and Policies
__________________
Work until your idols become your rivals.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Wednesday, December 04, 2013
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,549
Thanks: 618
Thanked 1,122 Times in 674 Posts
mhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daniyalahmed View Post
wrong!

Governors were appointed by the English East India Company, which was a private entity, did not have any control by the KING / QUEEN or SOVEREIGN.

VICEROY IS SENT ON BEHALF OF THE QUEEN. HE RULES AS AN AGENT OF QUEEN, PROTECTS HER INTERESTS etc.
The English East India company was an English company based in the United Kingdom after all so private entity itself was subject to British crown who could indirectly, or directly in some cases, influence its activities . Why else would the sovereign's government be even bothered if a private entity was loosing ground in 1858.
__________________
The precondition for existence of a higher humanity is not the state, but the nation possessing the necessary ability.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mhmmdkashif For This Useful Post:
parwarsha (Sunday, December 22, 2013)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.