u shud add prohibitions also in criminal paper, alonghwith essay of 20 marks

@Asif Malik

I think one can also add the follwing subjects in the Criminal Paper.

The Police Order, 2002.
The Offence against Property (Enforcement of Hadd) Ordinance of 1979.
The Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979.

But due to the short span of time for the candidates and the limited time duration in the paper, it is very much possible that the paper will mailnly contain questions from,

CrPC
and
PPC.

So one must rely and focus on these two above mentioned subjects.

__________________
Sweat in peace will lessen the blood in war.

Dear Candidates,
This is the course for the exam to be conducted by the High Court for the post of Civil Judge. I have gathered it from an advertisement. Please go through to this course.

PAPER CIVIL LAW. 100Marks

The Code of Civil Procedure 1908.
The West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance 1962.
The Contract Act 1872.
The Sale of Goods Act1930.
The Specific Relief Act 1877.
Muhammadan Law.
The Limitation Act 1908.
The Registration Act 1908.

PAPER CRIMINAL LAW. 80Marks

The Pakistan Penal Code 1860.
The Criminal Procedure Code 1898.
The Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order 1984.

PAPER ENGLISH ESSAY. 20Marks

__________________
Sweat in peace will lessen the blood in war.

Allah karay yeh writ successful ho jaye,to exam bhe late ho jaye.
wasay second paper ka to thora sa syllabus hay

@Asif Malik

If the writ bears the successfull result, then there are very little chance of exam being held on schedule. Also there could be possibility of the postponement of exam.

One must concentrate on the subjects and the preparation irrespective of the outcome of writ petition.

__________________
Sweat in peace will lessen the blood in war.

any update on the writ? will exam b on oct 4th?

plz confirm website where bare acts are available on line for LHC upcomming papers. thanks

plz tell website where whole bare act is avail free

LHC registrar, others issued notices on recruitment of civil judges

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Monday issued notices to the LHC registrar and two others on a petition seeking withdrawal of an advertisement for the recruitment of 339 civil judges in Punjab. The petitioner, Tariq Aziz Malik advocate, has made the LHC registrar, and the secretaries of the Services and General Administration and Law departments as respondents in the petition. The petitioner claimed the procedure adopted for the recruitment of the civil judges was unwarranted by law and the constitution. He said only the Punjab Public Service Commission (PPSC) had the authority to conduct the examination, as laid down in Section 5 of the Punjab Judicial Services Rules. He said according to the advertisement, the written exam would be held only for two subjects, which amounted to degrading the office of the civil judge as earlier the exam comprised seven subjects. staff report

LAHORE: Tariq Aziz Malik advocate on Friday moved an application before the Lahore High Court (LHC), requesting it to make the objections raised by the Punjab governor as part of his main petition seeking the withdrawal of an advertisement for the recruitment of 339 civil judges in Punjab.

The governor had raised objections against the appointments as the provincial government wanted to recruit the judicial officers in violation of the Punjab Judicial Service Rules of 1974, he stated.

Grade-16: The lawyer said the officials of grade-16 or above could not be appointed without following the rules, adding the government had also not laid down any criteria to ascertain the candidates’ knowledge.

The government action also lacked transparency and merit in the selection process, he added.

In the main petition, Malik claimed the procedure adopted for the recruitment of the civil judges was unwarranted by law and the constitution. He said only the Punjab Public Service Commission (PPSC) had the authority to conduct the examination, as laid down in Section 5 of the Punjab Judicial Services Rules.


LAHORE: Tariq Aziz Malik advocate on Friday moved an application before the Lahore High Court (LHC), requesting it to make the objections raised by the Punjab governor as part of his main petition seeking the withdrawal of an advertisement for the recruitment of 339 civil judges in Punjab.

The governor had raised objections against the appointments as the provincial government wanted to recruit the judicial officers in violation of the Punjab Judicial Service Rules of 1974, he stated.

Grade-16: The lawyer said the officials of grade-16 or above could not be appointed without following the rules, adding the government had also not laid down any criteria to ascertain the candidates’ knowledge.

The government action also lacked transparency and merit in the selection process, he added.

In the main petition, Malik claimed the procedure adopted for the recruitment of the civil judges was unwarranted by law and the constitution. He said only the Punjab Public Service Commission (PPSC) had the authority to conduct the examination, as laid down in Section 5 of the Punjab Judicial Services Rules.

Writ is pending before the Lahore High Court. The status quo is also granted. It is being heard by Honorable Mr Justice Saqib Nisar.

__________________
Sweat in peace will lessen the blood in war.