Najam

You got SMS ? Or call ?

got sms..

Received message for AD (NAB) Punjab, Interview to be conducted on 23rd June at Islamabad.

Regards

[QUOTE=mujtaba17;832700]Not yet.. Dark knight how many marks did you have?
and if we do not receive sms today it means we are "Farigh" ? :confused:[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=darkknight999;832736]Yeah, and now things are becoming complicated. I think it's too late in the evening to call, so not much hope now.

And best of luck, Raja Najam :)[/QUOTE]

what is your score of written part?

Regards

77. Yours, Hussain?

[quote=darkknight999;832822]77. Yours, hussain?[/quote]

76

[QUOTE=darkknight999;832822]77. Yours, Hussain?[/QUOTE]

how was your attempt of Psychological test? Further have you any experience? May be academic percentile and experience also played a role in finalization of interview list. what you say?

Regards

Hussain, hmm ...I am a fresh graduate, but I don't think experience or prior academic performance could have played any part. If they have decided not to call me then it must be because of the psych test performance. I don't know whether my performance was good or not. It's difficult to tell, especially because psychologists usually go for things that are not easily discernible. So I would say if I have not made it it must have been the psych test that caused it.

But best of luck to you, bro! Heartiest congratulations :)

[QUOTE=darkknight999;832847]Hussain, hmm ...I am a fresh graduate, but I don't think experience or prior academic performance could have played any part. If they have decided not to call me then it must be because of the psych test performance. I don't know whether my performance was good or not. It's difficult to tell, especially because psychologists usually go for things that are not easily discernible. So I would say if I have not made it it must have been the psych test that caused it.

But best of luck to you, bro! Heartiest congratulations :)[/QUOTE]

Go through the following link about detail of segregation of marks in connection with the written test and interview. Please share your views: [url]http://www.cssforum.com.pk/other-competitive-examinations/national-accountability-bureau-nab/100210-press-release-nab-establishment-division-circular.html[/url]

Regards

[QUOTE=Hussain_qureshi;832857]Go through the following link about detail of segregation of marks in connection with the written test and interview. Please share your views: [url]http://www.cssforum.com.pk/other-competitive-examinations/national-accountability-bureau-nab/100210-press-release-nab-establishment-division-circular.html[/url]

Regards[/QUOTE]

Well, legally speaking I am convinced that this circular does not apply to NAB notwithstanding all the arguments to the contrary which I have heard so far. Each of those arguments could be deconstructed, so I would still say that legally it does not bite NAB's recruitment process.

BUT IT APPEARS NAB is following the circular. Now, a lot of things happen in contravention of law and pass unnoticed. There are beneficiaries of every legal and illegal move. If you are a beneficiary of the latter just pray nobody challenges it in court and it goes unnoticed (Trust me 90% of such irregularities go unnoticed; very few are challenged in court.) So it's quite likely that if they ARE following the circular legally (on a bad illegal advice maybe) they will get away with it. I don't see many enthusiastic litigators round here. The summary: my legal opinion is that NAB can't follow this circular. If it does so, it shall be doing something illegal and make itself prone to a potentially successful lawsuit against it. My legal advice: Most probably, nobody will spend his energy and money on winning a case that would guarantee him only a chance but not a place. So don't panic regardless of its legality.

P.S: Maybe you will make it into the list without benefiting from this loophole. Who knows you deserve it already for some reason! So keep your pecker up :) Plus, what stops NAB from not awarding marks on the basis of interview? They can't legally do so under this circular, but what stops them from doing exactly the same under their own statute? The answer: NOTHING. Cheers! ;)