|
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Najam
You got SMS ? Or call ? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
got sms..
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Received message for AD (NAB) Punjab, Interview to be conducted on 23rd June at Islamabad.
Regards |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Regards |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
77. Yours, Hussain?
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
how was your attempt of Psychological test? Further have you any experience? May be academic percentile and experience also played a role in finalization of interview list. what you say?
Regards |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Hussain, hmm ...I am a fresh graduate, but I don't think experience or prior academic performance could have played any part. If they have decided not to call me then it must be because of the psych test performance. I don't know whether my performance was good or not. It's difficult to tell, especially because psychologists usually go for things that are not easily discernible. So I would say if I have not made it it must have been the psych test that caused it.
But best of luck to you, bro! Heartiest congratulations |
The Following User Says Thank You to darkknight999 For This Useful Post: | ||
Hussain_qureshi (Wednesday, May 27, 2015) |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Regards |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
BUT IT APPEARS NAB is following the circular. Now, a lot of things happen in contravention of law and pass unnoticed. There are beneficiaries of every legal and illegal move. If you are a beneficiary of the latter just pray nobody challenges it in court and it goes unnoticed (Trust me 90% of such irregularities go unnoticed; very few are challenged in court.) So it's quite likely that if they ARE following the circular legally (on a bad illegal advice maybe) they will get away with it. I don't see many enthusiastic litigators round here. The summary: my legal opinion is that NAB can't follow this circular. If it does so, it shall be doing something illegal and make itself prone to a potentially successful lawsuit against it. My legal advice: Most probably, nobody will spend his energy and money on winning a case that would guarantee him only a chance but not a place. So don't panic regardless of its legality. P.S: Maybe you will make it into the list without benefiting from this loophole. Who knows you deserve it already for some reason! So keep your pecker up Plus, what stops NAB from not awarding marks on the basis of interview? They can't legally do so under this circular, but what stops them from doing exactly the same under their own statute? The answer: NOTHING. Cheers! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Expected Allocation chart | rose_pak | CSS 2011 Exam | 110 | Tuesday, July 10, 2012 06:00 PM |
CE 2011 Final Result Announced | Last Island | CSS 2011 Exam | 73 | Monday, June 18, 2012 09:14 PM |
Observations on Performance of Candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2008 | Last Island | Subject Analysis | 20 | Saturday, November 26, 2011 01:37 PM |