[QUOTE=suhaibqaisar;838941]Today, I wrote this letter to FPSC...
It is stated that I appeared in the Screening Test for the post of Assistant Director (Case No. 26/2015) in Federal Government Organization held by Federal Public Service Commission on June 7, 2015. The examination was held in two batches i.e. Batch I (10:00 to 11:40) and Batch II (14:00 to 15:40).
The difficulty level was different for both tests. The paper of Batch I was much easier than that of Batch II. Also, nearly 30 questions were the same as were in the paper for the same post held on June 30, 2013.
This is a matter of serious grievances for the candidates of Batch II. The commission should have used the same yardstick to measure the caliber of candidates.
Now, to redress the grievances of the candidates of Batch II, the candidates of two batches may kindly be short listed separately, on the basis of percentage of candidates appeared in each batch. For example, if 60% candidates appeared in Batch I and 40% in Batch II, 60% candidates may be short listed from Batch I and 40% from Batch II.[/QUOTE]


I think this letter should be send by everyone to FPSC

[QUOTE=R channa;845151]Australia has world's largest cattle station up for sale.[/QUOTE]
The answer Australia could be possible, as far as cattle station is concern, but as per question in test India has largest cattle inventory.

[COLOR="Red"][QUOTE=adgoi;845446]I think this letter should be send by everyone to FPSC[/QUOTE]

Today, I wrote this letter to FPSC...
It is stated that I appeared in the Screening Test for the post of Assistant Director (Case No. 26/2015) in Federal Government Organization held by Federal Public Service Commission on June 7, 2015. The examination was held in two batches i.e. Batch I (100 to 11:40) and Batch II (140 to 15:40).
The difficulty level was different for both tests. The paper of Batch I was much easier than that of Batch II. Also, nearly 30 questions were the same as were in the paper for the same post held on June 30, 2013.
This is a matter of serious grievances for the candidates of Batch II. The commission should have used the same yardstick to measure the caliber of candidates.
Now, to redress the grievances of the candidates of Batch II, the candidates of two batches may kindly be short listed separately, on the basis of percentage of candidates appeared in each batch. For example, if 60% candidates appeared in Batch I and 40% in Batch II, 60% candidates may be short listed from Batch I and 40% from Batch II.[/COLOR]


agreed. I have also sent letter. Now I request you all please send because oceans are made by single drop of water. If anyone agree to this point of view that they are not given equal opportunity to fight then don'r sit on sofa and read this. and

Say [SIZE="3"][COLOR="Red"]"SAAADAA HAQQQ ETHEEE RAKHHH"
[/COLOR][/SIZE]
type a application of Ms word and sent it to Chairman FPSC.... I strongly believe of you who reads it , send application they will surely take notice of it.

Play your part or don't complain. choice is yours

[QUOTE=suhaibqaisar;838941]Today, I wrote this letter to FPSC...
It is stated that I appeared in the Screening Test for the post of Assistant Director (Case No. 26/2015) in Federal Government Organization held by Federal Public Service Commission on June 7, 2015. The examination was held in two batches i.e. Batch I (10:00 to 11:40) and Batch II (14:00 to 15:40).
The difficulty level was different for both tests. The paper of Batch I was much easier than that of Batch II. Also, nearly 30 questions were the same as were in the paper for the same post held on June 30, 2013.
This is a matter of serious grievances for the candidates of Batch II. The commission should have used the same yardstick to measure the caliber of candidates.
Now, to redress the grievances of the candidates of Batch II, the candidates of two batches may kindly be short listed separately, on the basis of percentage of candidates appeared in each batch. For example, if 60% candidates appeared in Batch I and 40% in Batch II, 60% candidates may be short listed from Batch I and 40% from Batch II.[/QUOTE]
I have send this letter to fpsc through email at least. If you can't mail it at least email it to fpsc with subject f4-26B/2015-R you can get email address from fpsc website. Or it is (fpsc at fpsc dot gov dot pk)

Sent

Sent.

Sent from my V40 using Tapatalk

Informed them of our concern..... Everyone should send at least one email..

[QUOTE=Nonconformist;846008][COLOR="Red"]

agreed. I have also sent letter. Now I request you all please send because oceans are made by single drop of water. If anyone agree to this point of view that they are not given equal opportunity to fight then don'r sit on sofa and read this. and

[/QUOTE]

Yeah everyone should send the letter to Chairman FPSC and PM's Grievance Cell.

I'll share the contact details in a while.

Further, I'll send my letter after eid.

Sent

Although my test was good but as a number of candidates pointed out the matter of difference in the difficulty level of both batches so i also sent the email to FPSC ,, come on batch II , we need to join together for our due right,,either your test was good or bad, in both cases I expect the candidates of batch II to be responsible enough in the matter of sending a complaint letter to FPSC.
regards