It has been noticed in recent past that FPSC conducts tests in sessions (batches) where the no of applicants exceeds a certain limit. Two things should have been ensured in the above scenario where FPSC had to conduct tests in parts:
1) Contrary to PPSC and NTS, the other credible test conducting bodies, FPSC shows its limitation in taking the tests of all the candidates at the same time. So it should maintain a very equitable and just criterion when taking tests of all sessions.
2) FPSC must ensure that no session gets deprived of competitive edge: even a few numbers make huge difference gap in getting shortlisted.

In 2017 IB test result, available on FPSC website, we can see that more than 85% candidates who have passed the test were from 2nd batch. Remaining candidates from first batch are expected to be excluded during further shortlisting as per 1:8 ratio. (bitter reality for them)
So suggestions are needed whether we should put effort to take FPSC's attention to this matter or not? There was huge difference in paper difficulty level as well as repetitions of MCQs to give a gigantic edge to 2nd batch.

Did anyone notice that?

Yeah! You're right bro. I failed to secure this shortlisting though I was expecting to sail through.. Two of my friends got shortlisted and both of them are from the second batch. I think that it's a high time for the FPSC to take pains in conducting tests of all the candidates, simultenously, for ensuring justice to prevail and merit to uphold. Regards

__________________
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts" (Winston Churchill)

I am confused as to how Fpsc passes candidates from different batches.Earlier I was told by someone that Fpsc passes equal number of candidates from each batch; but now in this thread you are claiming 85 % of the candidates have passed from batch 2.Surely , batch 1 was difficult compared to batch 2.

more thn 100 people who qualify screening test were from Batch 1.majority mcqs of batch 1 test were frm cravan, jehangir books while some from nts book but batch 2 mcqs was general and its arithmetic portion was difficult..
i agree that fcps should take test at one time and will recommend to fpsc to increase the mcqs from 100 to 200 and there should be marking system that if someone takes above 150 marks we will call it for further process.
in 1:8 criteria majoirty lucky people qualify the test.

Does result for test held on 15-10-2017 Assistant Manager (IT) announced ?

Brother You're one of many people on this forum whom folks on the forum have been seeing talking sense. You told and guided people in respect of preparation in a rational way. For example you told them that the things were available on the internet in original and free of cost to get benefit of (Acts and Laws to be covered for various posts) and that it was not appropriate to beg for so-called notes which are actually a way to mint money.
FPSC has done a terrible mistake in this IB test 2017. Things are available and on the record. No one has to trust me. Just go and find the list and behold. 91% (if all quotas i.e. women, minority, disabled are counted collectively) candidates are from 2nd batch. What does this mean? Does everyone in the first batch deserve the pain and suffering, such humiliated fate, deprivation of their right to being treated equally repeatedly just because of our institutional bankruptcy?

Ms. Aneeqa you don't have to shrug it off as a 'claim'. You only need to go to FPSC's website and download the result for the test of IB 2017. Now you come to find a list of 242 candidates. Out of these 242 candidates only 21 are from first batch. You can calculate the percentage.
Now how to know that 21 people were from first batch? When we fill online forms to apply for the jobs our data gets stored. FPSC makes a list of candidates which is in alphabetical order. So every time there are batches, the 1st batch comprises names from letter 'A' to 'L' and candidates from 2nd batch have their names starting form alphabets 'M' to 'Z'.
Rest is on you to decide on this 'claim'? FPSC is there you can confirm by calling them whether this is actually the way they distribute candidates into batches.
Some people are claiming otherwise by saying that over 100 to 150 people are from batch 1, I don't know what their motives are but mine is to at least create an awareness that the poor and unlucky boys and girls from batch 1 also invested the same amount of time, labour and money just to find out that the institutional lethargy and malaise have betrayed them. We people are content with our lot and don't find it like fighting for our rights yet what is harm in knowing the truth?

__________________
Never Quit!

Is this result about F.4-140? I couldn't find it anywhere on the fpsc site. Please give me a link anyone?

http://fpsc.gov.pk/icms/user/news_de...p?newsid=17725

__________________
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts" (Winston Churchill)

s this result about F.4-140? I couldn't find it anywhere on the fpsc site. Please give me a link anyone?

As new posts have been announced in the recent adv of FPSC, shouldn't there be a concerted effort of writing to FPSC about the great injustice in earlier test for the same post where almost 100% (after 1:8 ratio shortlisting for descriptive) candidates from batch 2 were shortlisted?
Comment please.

__________________
Never Quit!