Something definitely seems to be very wrong here. Either the markers are monkeys (remember the spelling and grammar of the MCQ's!) and we have been sold a lame donkey in that unless the answers were 'outlines' they couldn't understand a proper essay answer OR there is something highly suspicious going on here.

We have no info on who the markers are, or what the marking scheme is. This is a private corporation, how can the state be sure it works meritoriously and in the national interest? If Pak govt can be infiltrated by the enemies agents, how hard is it to do so in the NTS?

I would also link the many court decisions declaring the NTS illegal, the personal claims lost by them in court, the multitude of incompetence, but there isn't enough forum space.

We didn't do anything wrong, NTS has done something very very wrong.

(There is also another possibility that the ISI itself rejected us for some reason, e.g. maybe they don't want overqualified people etc. but I can only speculate)

Do you know if they will send us our checked exam papers though?

__________________
Playing an away match in Uganda.

Yes, I'm going to contact MOD. I fail to digest this embarrassing score, esp after a good screening test.

Sir no one is blind enough here. Institutions know what nts really is, judgements should be quoted to those who are unaware. If MOD sends advertisements to nts, they must know how much capable nts is. Everyone has its own axe to grind here. The maximum is to request nts for recheck or email mod people, no one can force them

They wont send you the checked papers, the thing is to request them and forward your concerns. This is digital age, with little effort you people can make your voice heard in highups of nts and even mod personnel. Can visit nts headoffice by 2-3 people to convince them . This is right way to proceed, if a croud gathers like people are commenting here then everyone failed will ask for paper recheck which nts will never entertain. So coordinated efforts by few genuinely affected people in right way may help to address the concerns. Time is very short.
Regards.

Bajee ye kya hogaya

Dear Ambber...
I am also affected by this...
I got 148 in screeening test...
And I was expecting 140 plus in descrip..
But they gave just 93...
One of friend said here(PMS qualified-twice)...
There is issue of relevancy...

I have also appeared for css in 2017...
Demo (Essay)
18 th amend (pak aff)
I knew USA election (usa hist)
Secr Gen (i law)
Arab Spr (cur aff)
PSL (News)...

I am not satisfied with numbers...
We will try next time...

There were two blunders that she did:
1. She jotted down outlines, whereas the outlines were not required. That's why she failed. Also the topic that she attempted was not convenient for her. She must have got 10 marks in essay.

2. She is good at CA paper, but she wrote very detailed answers, whereas, we were required to attempt simple and to the point.

Dear, Asad, Ambber, Wolfy, Lisa Simpson...
Miraj Awan, Aqeel Ahmed, and Malik Raheel...
I have doubt on their assesment...
What should we do???