You can never be sure about interview marks, that's what i have gathered. and people (Failed DMC's) got 700+. So you must be 700+ in order to have a fighting chance

Guys, there is one defining factor in making an accurate guess about your written marks and that is kind of optionals you chose, no offence but expecting 750-800 score with subjects no other than Social Work, Mass Comm is simply a travesty of rationality. So being hopeful is good thing but do not expect too much that the result shock might get unbearable for you !!!..

[QUOTE=Loveu Bartowski;837495]Guys, there is one defining factor in making an accurate guess about your written marks and that is kind of optionals you chose, no offence but expecting 750-800 score with subjects no other than Social Work, Mass Comm is simply a travesty of rationality. So being hopeful is good thing but do not expect too much that the result shock might get unbearable for you !!!..[/QUOTE]
Agreed,but you can never estimate your marks simply by high scoring/low scoring criteria.
In my view examiners have awarded graciuosly in
Geography
Mass Comm
Public adm.
So those who had these sort of combinations can expect excellent marks.

[QUOTE=futuristic;837497]Agreed,but you can never estimate your marks simply by high scoring/low scoring criteria.
In my view examiners have awarded graciuosly in
Geography
Mass Comm
Public adm.
So those who had these sort of combinations can expect excellent marks.[/QUOTE]

My subjects were Geography, Mass Comm And Socio.
Futuristic please comment on the pattern of Socio if you know.

Thanks

[QUOTE=futuristic;837497]Agreed,but you can never estimate your marks simply by high scoring/low scoring criteria.
In my view examiners have awarded graciuosly in
Geography
Mass Comm
Public adm.
So those who had these sort of combinations can expect excellent marks.[/QUOTE]
Yeah bro both Geo and Public Ad are scoring, but remember we have 500+ qualified candidates and just about 20 seats to compete and there would be a huge number of candidates with such scoring subjects !!!..

Loveu Bartowski , What are your subjects?

And secondly the interview would not matter much this time, as in case of majority of candidates, it didn't seem a defining one, keeping the types of questions, the panel was asking, in view. In my opinion, they would award in interview more or less in the same way as written marks. Interview would just help the panel in calibration.

[QUOTE=mujtaba17;837530]My subjects were Geography, Mass Comm And Socio.
Futuristic please comment on the pattern of Socio if you know.

Thanks[/QUOTE]
Mujtaba your subject combinations is good.As far as sociology is concerned few people have opted it therefore if you have attempted your paper well I see your score above 700.
PS:lovebartowski agreed bro.

[QUOTE=mujtaba17;837533]Loveu Bartowski , What are your subjects?[/QUOTE]
Geo, Mass Comm and Philosophy

my optional were: mass com, public admn, and social work.