Friday, March 29, 2024
04:23 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Sindh Public Service Commission > SPSC (CCE)

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Saturday, April 11, 2015
Tenrai's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Karachi
Posts: 55
Thanks: 9
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Tenrai is on a distinguished road
Default ... And the drama unfolds, SPSC ordered to prove legitimacy: C.C.E 2013

SPSC officials told to clarify exam irregularities

Karachi

The Sindh High Court on Tuesday directed the Sindh Public Service Commission secretary and others to file comments over a petition that questions the competence of the commission’s chairman and members.

The petitioners, Imtiaz Ali Shah and Sultan Ahmed, have sought screening tests for the provincial civil services examination, submitting that the SPSC had screened 18,000 candidates for over 200 provincial civil service posts including assistant commissioners, excise and taxation, labour and section officers.

Providing details of alleged irregularities in the exams, they submitted that the commission had ‘illegally’ conducted screening tests for the written exams and that the passing mark initially set at 30 percent was later moved up to 50 percent.

Questioning the commission’s competence, the petitioners’ counsel, Shafqat Hussain Masoomi, claimed that answers to 11 of the exam’s questions were incorrect. Furthermore, they said there was no provision for screening tests in the rules of the commission.

The petitioners alleged that children from influential political families had been allowed to use unfair means during the test, which was held on December 28, 2014, and that a total of nine ‘grace marks’ were awarded to ‘favourites’ who had otherwise failed the exam.

They requested the court to declare the screening tests illegal and restrain the commission from holding this year’s written combined competitive examinations, which commenced on Tuesday.

The counsel submitted that an identical petition against the appointment of the SPSC chairman was also pending before the SHC which could be heard collectively.

The SHC bench observed that a rejoinder affidavit needed to be filed by the SPSC on the petitions as a number of averments have been made by the commission in its comments.

It further said that since the SPSC exams had commenced, the petitions may have an effect and directed the court office to tag all similar petitions for a hearing on April 16.

The court clarified that if one or more of the petitions succeeded, or if the court deemed appropriate, the SPSC shall be bound to arrange separate written examination for within a specified timeframe.

http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-New...irregularities

天来
__________________
:: Iron Will :: "What Ever does not destroy me - Makes me stronger "- F.W.Nietzsch
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Saturday, April 11, 2015
Tenrai's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Karachi
Posts: 55
Thanks: 9
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Tenrai is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenrai View Post
It further said that since the SPSC exams had commenced, the petitions may have an effect and directed the court office to tag all similar petitions for a hearing on April 16.

The court clarified that if one or more of the petitions succeeded, or if the court deemed appropriate, the SPSC shall be bound to arrange separate written examination for within a specified timeframe.

http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-New...irregularities

天来
SPSC shall be bound to arrange separate written examination? Does this mean, all our hard work will be in vain? intriguing!

Your views?


天来
__________________
:: Iron Will :: "What Ever does not destroy me - Makes me stronger "- F.W.Nietzsch
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Saturday, April 11, 2015
naveedgsmemon's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SUKKUR SINDH PAKISTAN
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
naveedgsmemon is on a distinguished road
Default

what will happen now C.C.E 2013 is going on
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Saturday, April 11, 2015
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Don't know!
Posts: 166
Thanks: 267
Thanked 63 Times in 48 Posts
sidra siyal is on a distinguished road
Default

Nothing will happen fellows, same petition thing happened back in 2009 CCE exam aswell, and kuch bhi nahi huwa tha
__________________
All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sidra siyal For This Useful Post:
Sajid888 (Saturday, April 11, 2015)
  #5  
Old Saturday, April 11, 2015
MIR A GHAFFAR's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Larkana
Posts: 83
Thanks: 56
Thanked 39 Times in 25 Posts
MIR A GHAFFAR is on a distinguished road
Default

Any thing is possible,what if court court declares exams null and void?
__________________
Give Light,and the Darkness will Disappear of itself.
DESIDERIOUS ERASMUS
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Saturday, April 11, 2015
Tenrai's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Karachi
Posts: 55
Thanks: 9
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Tenrai is on a distinguished road
Default

^Exactly what I have been worried about; if the High Court decides against SPSC that would mean screening test will become null void and SPSC will be forced to retake written examination; this would be a challenge, considering the total number of aspirants is in tens of thousands. Further more, where will they get the funds to conduct exams?

天来
__________________
:: Iron Will :: "What Ever does not destroy me - Makes me stronger "- F.W.Nietzsch
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Saturday, April 11, 2015
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sindh
Posts: 230
Thanks: 55
Thanked 109 Times in 74 Posts
Babakhan is on a distinguished road
Default

After going through this thread and the comments of the court, it can be said without any doubt that court will order the SPSC in upcoming hearings to conduct the fresh exam for all the aspirants who could not appeared due to the screening test. They may or may not nullify the existing exam but they will surely order a parallel exam of same nature to be conducted in future .

Secondly if the chairman is also dislodged than things may further be deteriorated. If Court has admitted these petitions than they are definitely going to safeguard the rights of almost 20,000 aspirants who were short listed and affected by screening test.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Saturday, April 11, 2015
pureapak's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Karachi
Posts: 854
Thanks: 333
Thanked 487 Times in 320 Posts
pureapak is a jewel in the roughpureapak is a jewel in the roughpureapak is a jewel in the rough
Default

No cancellation no nothing could happen against the decree of ADI , ADDO and dozens of their SPOONS.
Every institute serves political will of the so called democracy, Sindh high court is no exception. PPP has to get it done by the end of this year and none dares withhold them from accomplishing it. Be it the judges or the commission. The ones you are looking forward for the dispensation of justice are all sold.
Enjoy the drama queen , go home retire to bed have some wonderful dreams because for you this set up has nothing more than dreamy lollypops.
__________________
"Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how popular it remains?"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Saturday, April 11, 2015
Member
PMS / PCS Award: Serving PMS / PCS (BS 17) officers are eligible only. - Issue reason: SPSC CCE 2013 - Merit 8 (SO)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jamshoro, Sindh
Posts: 80
Thanks: 12
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
Jamil Mughal is on a distinguished road
Default

It's an exam dear, which has already commenced, not a drama. And I could not find a single man who used influence to passed the screening test.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jamil Mughal For This Useful Post:
Sajid888 (Saturday, April 11, 2015), sidra siyal (Saturday, April 11, 2015)
  #10  
Old Saturday, April 11, 2015
Member
PMS / PCS Award: Serving PMS / PCS (BS 17) officers are eligible only. - Issue reason: SPSC CCE 2013 - Merit 8 (SO)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jamshoro, Sindh
Posts: 80
Thanks: 12
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
Jamil Mughal is on a distinguished road
Default

And nine grace marks were given because only nine answer keys were incorrect. Therefore, the counsel for the petitioner shall come up with a new excuse. As It is not going to work.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jamil Mughal For This Useful Post:
sidra siyal (Saturday, April 11, 2015)
Reply

Tags
cce screening test 2013, drama, petition

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.