Thursday, April 25, 2024
11:07 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Sindh Public Service Commission > SPSC (CCE)

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #11  
Old Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Nasar Abbasi's Avatar
Deputy District Officer (Revenue)
PMS / PCS Award: Serving PMS / PCS (BS 17) officers are eligible only. - Issue reason: SPSC CCE 2009 - Roll no. 1852
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Karachi
Posts: 59
Thanks: 61
Thanked 71 Times in 36 Posts
Nasar Abbasi is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by candidatespsc View Post
Nasar abbasi,

when u filled the option form, u should have mentioned onlu DDO-R as the sole choice , why did u mention other choices also, if u preferred only to be DDO-R , u knw these things r not SAID during interview but the best way to do it , is the option form. u must accept that SO job also has the potential that AD Job may be left for that.

Baba khan.

what Nasar wrote, must be read by u carefully and also get ur answer ready if some DDO-R dont join and SPSC beause of waiting list offers u DDO-R, bet me dear u will have 1000 arguments to praise the job in Sindh Government, particularly the Revenue Department. if u r happy and satifisfied ( which u must be) so dont spread despair and furstration among candidates starting their career in Sindh Government. plz highlight the weakness and bad governance of Sindh Government but plz avoid giving sweeping statements.
@ Candidate spsc....

dear when spsc had annnounced CCE 2008, I was working as Producer News and Current Affairs in PTV. At that time I wanted to join (If succeeded) any of the post announced in CCE 2008 due to certain reasons. later on in January 2010, I passed this AD exam conducted by FPSC. This job is very good with lots of opportunities of postings in Pakistan and all around the world where there are Pakistani missions issuing passports to pakistani nationals. So during the interview I was again asked to fill choice form. at that time I only wrote DDO-R. During the interview I was asked that at the time of submitting application you had used all the options, why now only DDO -R. so my answer was in that context. You are right that my answer may not have been suitable but I never wanted to be declared successful on the post which I might not join. NO DOUBT SO IS A VERY GOOD POSITION WITH OPPORTUNITY TO REACH AT SECRETARY LEVEL. OTHER JOBS ARE ALSO VERY GOOD, BUT IT IS A MATTER OF PRIORITY OF AN INDIVIDUAL WHICH VARY FROM PERSON TO PERSON . This is what I wanted to say.

Thanks and Take good care of yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Thursday, February 17, 2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hyderabad, Sindh
Posts: 127
Thanks: 36
Thanked 49 Times in 37 Posts
candidatespsc is on a distinguished road
Default

ok dear Nasar:::: now i understand ur point of view and agree wid u that if one doesnt wanna join any job, one should not write that in option form.

Regards and take care.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to candidatespsc For This Useful Post:
Nasar Abbasi (Thursday, February 17, 2011)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Observations on Performance of Candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2008 Last Island Subject Analysis 20 Saturday, November 26, 2011 01:37 PM
Observations on Performance of Candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2007 Last Island Subject Analysis 15 Tuesday, February 16, 2010 03:51 AM
Observations on Performance of Candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2006 Aarwaa Subject Analysis 0 Thursday, August 07, 2008 01:46 PM
Observations on performance of candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2005 Aarwaa Subject Analysis 4 Sunday, February 17, 2008 11:21 PM
Text of British Act 1832 Rana Munawar Farooq British History 0 Monday, August 13, 2007 07:09 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.