I see, so it seems you do not support the screening test altogether. Main point to consider here is the number of candidates appearing exams. You see we all quote like "3-4% of the total candidates appeared in the exam passed" right? When the commission takes a wise decision to include the screening test to check the candidate's knowledge, just the basic newspaper-knowledge, just so as to filter the otherwise not eligible candidates for the rest of the exam and save our tax money and time for every stakeholder in the process, I think we should support. As for the qualification, you know well about our institutions, their performance. I was point to government college. Acquiring a bachelors degree is just a piece of cake, you know.

Here I am quoting from FPSC's annual report 2013

Mr. Abbasi is absolutely spot on with his analysis that Competitive exam students are prone to the written format of examination and it is unjust that if suddenly their fate is decided through MCQs and years of hard work is flushed through a roughly made exam. I have just seen the MCQs posted here in one of the threads and found them absolutely illogical. MCQs should be balanced as if the examiners must not set a question asking the name of his father.

Though I disagreed with Mr. Abbasi on many a times in the past but I consider his advice and guidance to the youngsters is no less than a yard stick.

Dear Abbasi Sahab..... Game is over now.....
The objections you have raised were valid before conducting of screening test.... Im also among the victims of such a illogical test......
Im failed by 1 mark..... I burnt my night oil for qualifying the test... But spsc has decided our future on the basis of such tukka based test....
Whatever we will now discuss here would be waste of time and energy because we all are aware of policies of sindh govt and spsc....
Dear abbasi sahab what will be your line of action?

Dear Shuiab Ahmed, as far as my line of action is concerned, I will do nothing as I qualified PCS (CCE 2008) and am now serving as Assistant Commissioner. Since this test seems illogical so I just raised the point. Line of action is to be decided by those who appeared in the screening test or those who think that this test is unjustified.

right line of action should be decided by candidates and it should be at least that they should protest that passing criteria should be 40%.

__________________
Some thing is better than Nothing

So what is fault of those who scored 38, 39? Once passing criteria is set, it could not be changed. There is no ground to challenge this test at any Legal forum.

__________________
When you try, you risk failure. When you don’t try, you ensure it.

Dear you should have to take a look at the test which is conducted today....
It can not be deemed as a test by any means but it was the gamble, completely based on tukka and illogical questions..........
As far as i know test is conducted for sorting out the eligible and ineligible but ironically this test was based on selecting lucky ones by ignoring hardworking students

Legal Points:

1-Did spsc announce mention screening test in ad? a BIG not?

2-If not, then it means the screening test is illegal and we as a youth can raise voices!

3-Previously, SPSC mentinoed different syllabus including Islamiat and now they did not include the Islamiat? It is illigal too.

4-If you analyse key "C", as per many candidates, they did their questions correctly but it in c the ans are different?

5-They mentioned about current affairs but why questions from Past affairs with dates-particularly date questions of 2013, I think these were same questions which were sat for screening 2013, they did not bother to set current paper? it is a big injustice

6-Last but not the least, Every post contains ethics, religious orientation, then, why Islamiat is not included?

7-Most Important point,screening test can be challanged because as per constitution of civil services, and spsc there is no any thing like screening test then why screening test happened?

You all should have challenged this test before attempting it. Good Luck!

__________________
When you try, you risk failure. When you don’t try, you ensure it.

Infact, many candidates also challanged the both things, e.g age relaxation and also screening test. So, I am sure, the procees of combine has many hardles to cross let's see what is the next phase. But the reality is that, it was illogical and worst test ever I have come to know in my life.

And tell me one thing, why Islamiat not included in the test, does it mean the Islamiat is no more important in the country that is created on the basis of Islamic ideology? Above all, they did not mention any thing about screening in the ad, then why screening test? Is it legal as per policies of CCE and constitutional aspects?