Is the SPSC Screening Test for CCE legal. - Page 3

altaf Hussainen · #21 Sunday, December 28, 2014

Alhumdulilah ,,after checking keys which are posted on spsc web,I successfully qualified for CCE 2013 ...Thanks God

...Dear mujhe aek baat buht peculiar lagee aap log screen test k against quon ho agar aap maen ability hae tu fear kis baat ka...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Invincible · #22 Sunday, December 28, 2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by flyer

Infact, many candidates also challanged the both things, e.g age relaxation and also screening test. So, I am sure, the procees of combine has many hardles to cross let's see what is the next phase. But the reality is that, it was illogical and worst test ever I have come to know in my life.

What can not be cured, must be endured. May Allah be with all of you in your future pursuits.

Indomitable · #23 Sunday, December 28, 2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by flyer

Legal Points:

1-Did spsc announce mention screening test in ad? a BIG not?

2-If not, then it means the screening test is illegal and we as a youth can raise voices!

3-Previously, SPSC mentinoed different syllabus including Islamiat and now they did not include the Islamiat? It is illigal too.

4-If you analyse key "C", as per many candidates, they did their questions correctly but it in c the ans are different?

5-They mentioned about current affairs but why questions from Past affairs with dates-particularly date questions of 2013, I think these were same questions which were sat for screening 2013, they did not bother to set current paper? it is a big injustice

6-Last but not the least, Every post contains ethics, religious orientation, then, why Islamiat is not included?

7-Most Important point,screening test can be challanged because as per constitution of civil services, and spsc there is no any thing like screening test then why screening test happened?

other points:
1. passing criterion for compulsory subjct is 40% in pcs main written exam, then why 50% now?
2. passing critrion for css screening test was set as per css rules, means 40%, then why 50% now?
3. spsc proceeded with conducting test without amending its rules. screening test is nowhere mentioned in the existing pcs rules- big anomaly

spsc has just imitated nts practices; it followed nts practice of 50% passing marks, giving carbon copy to candidates. but paper-setters of spsc do not know, i guess, nts also modifies its passing criteria afterwards keeping in view competition and instructions from concerned departments. spsc did not differentiate itself from nts, a private institution

ashiq e hussain · #24 Monday, December 29, 2014

i think we should make a call to SPSC office so that they could realize this sheer injustice . . . passing marks should be 40% since test was very much difficult .
CHAIRMAN Chief Justice (Retired) Dr. Agha Rafiq Ahmed Khan PHONE

22-9200702
email: chairman@spsc.gov.pk

JAAGO PAKISTAN JAAGO
RAISE YOUR VOICE AGAINST THIS SHEER INJUSTICE

sharp mind · #25 Monday, December 29, 2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nasar Abbasi

Is it as per policies and rules of SPSC to take screening test before written exam of CCE. In principle screening test can't be justified because MCQs best tests are not the criteria of judging some one's competence or incompetence. Those who are expert in taking MCQs based test may not be as good in written as in MCQs and vice versa. So as per my point of view this screening test idea is ridiculous, this should be challenged whether SPSC is authorised to take this test or not. Member are requested to share your views.

Sir, as far as my point of view is concerned, the test was so tough

. They Played with the emotions of Competent candidate, who indeed could perform better than those who passed with luck. SPSC must rethink over this matter

because the ratio will approximately low.
Regards.
Muhammad Ali Qureshi

Kainat khan · #26 Monday, December 29, 2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nasar Abbasi

Is it as per policies and rules of SPSC to take screening test before written exam of CCE. In principle screening test can't be justified because MCQs best tests are not the criteria of judging some one's competence or incompetence. Those who are expert in taking MCQs based test may not be as good in written as in MCQs and vice versa. So as per my point of view this screening test idea is ridiculous, this should be challenged whether SPSC is authorised to take this test or not. Member are requested to share your views.

yes absolutely right..its very disheartning 😪totally opposite to our expectations...if they had to conduct test,they must hv to include both math nd islamiat...may be i am wrong but there was not evn a sngle question about ths year :/ cant be say now that one is intellignt or not..its only is tht one is lucky or not👎to hv an exact tukka ability :/

flyer · #27 Monday, December 29, 2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indomitable

spsc has just imitated nts practices; it followed nts practice of 50% passing marks, giving carbon copy to candidates. but paper-setters of spsc do not know, i guess, nts also modifies its passing criteria afterwards keeping in view competition and instructions from concerned departments. spsc did not differentiate itself from nts, a private institution

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharp mind

Sir, as far as my point of view is concerned, the test was so tough

. They Played with the emotions of Competent candidate, who indeed could perform better than those who passed with luck. SPSC must rethink over this matter

because the ratio will approximately low.
Regards.
Muhammad Ali Qureshi

Screening is unconstitutional, it must be canceled, if not, then as per PCS marking rules, the passing marks should be 33 or 40 what is a requirement in the descriptive papers. I am thinking to case a file against SPSC because our four years' hard working and wastage of time is not free to lose like this brutally by SPSC!

Quote:

Originally Posted by ashiq e hussain

i think we should make a call to SPSC office so that they could realize this sheer injustice . . . passing marks should be 40% since test was very much difficult .
CHAIRMAN Chief Justice (Retired) Dr. Agha Rafiq Ahmed Khan PHONE

22-9200702
email: chairman@spsc.gov.pk

JAAGO PAKISTAN JAAGO
RAISE YOUR VOICE AGAINST THIS SHEER INJUSTICE

I am with you, we, in our library and many other friends are thinking to case a file against SPSC and their unconstitutioonal rules, because there is no any screening test in spsc, beside this, if they have commenced it, then, the passing marks should be as per descriptive rules e.g passing marks 33 or 40. 50 marks is another injustice by spsc. I am with you guys, we will fight for our right.

sansaar · #28 Monday, December 29, 2014

Dear All,

I know it was totally unexpected for all of us but I must Appreciate SPSC for taking test peacefully. Test was simply for filtering out the candidates and they are done with this. It is useless to file a case and all that!!

Those who are saying that test was out of the syllabus and all that I would like to ask one thing from them. What if you had passed this exam?

Aspirant007 · #29 Monday, December 29, 2014

A lot of guys are talking about the legality of the test because they didn't qualify. I also failed by 4 marks but before the test I was thinking that over the years SPSC has lost its credibility to a position that many candidates were demanding the closure of SPSC for ever.

But after seeing the arrangements and the transparency of the test, I must say that I am impressed with the SPSC administration and they have laid the foundation of screening tests in competitive exams. Chairman SPSC should be applauded for this professionalism and transparent conduct of the test.

And for the ones who say that people passed by tukka, please don't cover your failure by posting such childish remarks.

I am sad that I failed after a good preparation, but at the same time I am happy that merit prevailed.

inayatali · #30 Monday, December 29, 2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nasar Abbasi

Is it as per policies and rules of SPSC to take screening test before written exam of CCE. In principle screening test can't be justified because MCQs best tests are not the criteria of judging some one's competence or incompetence. Those who are expert in taking MCQs based test may not be as good in written as in MCQs and vice versa. So as per my point of view this screening test idea is ridiculous, this should be challenged whether SPSC is authorised to take this test or not. Member are requested to share your views.

Totally Agreed with Nisar Abbasi... Even those candidates who have specialization in some subjects are unble to qualify such tough test... I think this was not test of any kind of Screening.... I m not saying this because i failed to qualify but my expereince of tests such tests Army commision, Police ASI etc says that "Screening tests always easier" and later real tests would be difficult..... i always support screening test to filter nonerious but such difficult test and negative results really demotivates and depress serious and studious candidates......

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Today in Pakistan History	javedkey	Pakistan Affairs	0	Tuesday, November 25, 2014 01:01 AM
Psychology, By David G. Myers, 6th Edition	sarfrazmayo	Psychology	24	Sunday, July 20, 2014 03:47 PM
Us-north Korea Relations	atifch	News & Articles	6	Wednesday, November 01, 2006 05:28 AM

The Following User Says Thank You to Invincible For This Useful Post:
Ana (Sunday, December 28, 2014)

The Following User Says Thank You to ashiq e hussain For This Useful Post:
Indomitable (Monday, December 29, 2014)

The Following User Says Thank You to flyer For This Useful Post:
Indomitable (Monday, December 29, 2014)

The Following User Says Thank You to sansaar For This Useful Post:
Would be (Monday, December 29, 2014)

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Aspirant007 For This Useful Post:
pureapak (Monday, December 29, 2014), Would be (Monday, December 29, 2014)