???

[quote=exclusively;819972][b]indian history ii paper~pcs 2015/cce~13[/b]

[b]note[/b]: Attempt any six questions:

Q.1 how politicial turmoil in central asia in early decades of 16th century a.d. Catalyzed the political conditions in south asia.

Q.2 how indus valley was conquered by british east india company?

Q.3 "farid khan popularly known in history as sher shah suri was the first ruler who displayed a real aptitude for civil government". Explain

q.4 critically review the mughal--marhathas relations during the time of aurangzeb. How far was his deccan policy responsible twoards the downfall of mughal empire?

Q.5 discuss in detail central asian policy of emperor shah jahan.

Q.6. Discuss socioal, economic, political and intellectual conditions of sindh during mughal period.

Q.7. Trace history of arrival of different european nations and their internecine rivalry for supremacy in indopak continent. Why the english were able to be successful in long run?

Q.8 short notes on any three of the following:
I) noor jahan
ii) taj mahal
iii) dara shikhon
iv) aurangzeb
v) nadir shah's attack on india[/quote]
any one has indian history part 1 paper of cce 2013????

can you share the outline of Q 1 ??

[QUOTE=exclusively;821509]Sorry to late reply, as I was busy in my job due to overload of work.

Q. 1 is simple, as Baber failed in "Central Asia" from Farghana to Kabul, I gave the facts and figures about Farghana, Samarkand defeats and recapturing, then I started its second portion of South and East Asia where Daulat Khan Lodhi, Rana Sanga and Mewati invited Babur to defeat Ibrahim Lodhi on account of political turmoil. Thus, eventually Babar ascended the throne and laid down the first stone of Mughal empire in the 16th century. I also drew a map of Panipat in this question.

Q.2, It is very simple and straight question, during Jahangir era, East India company came to India (Indus Valley) and they set their first factory in merat, and then they did trade and engulfed the whole political and social conditions. Then I mentioned Mughal Emperors' incapable role because they did not introduce any law of ascending throne, lack of Jihad's doctrine, fond of merry making/drinking/luxurious lives and inefficient political policies and bla bla and thet's why British East India company exploited the situation. Thus, Dalhouse, Lord Canning, role of Mir Qasim, Mir Jaffar and ultimately war of Independence incidence took place and East India Company conquered Indus Valley.

I gave outlines, and attempted to the point. Plus, I quoted Lane Poole, Smith and I.H Qureshi's quations.[/QUOTE]


Well, I think you have made the question very lengthy excessively; In this way, that was easy to attempt; but in my opinion, you could have focused on Babur only. Like his political difficulties in Central Asia; then his attention and consequently success South Asia.