My prediction: CCE-2013 Scoring trend in rescheduled exam
 

After going through all the papers, I predict that the following scoring trend will prevail in rescheduled CCE-2013 (2017).


[B]Scoring subjects[/B]
1-Applied Mathematics
2-Geographt
3-Human Anatomy
5-Zoology
6-Physics
7-Statistics
8-French
9-Islamiat


[B]Moderate scoring subjects[/B]
1-Commerce
2-Civil Law
3-European History
4-Indian History II
5-Political Science
6-Sindhi literature
7-Ethics and Psychology



[B]Slaughtering Subjects[/B]
1-Public Administration
2-Sociology
3-English Literature
4-Mass Communication
5-International Relations.


[B]Causes of failures can be:[/B]
1-In Essay, if no outlines are sketched
2-Possibilities can be failed in aggregate
3-GK can be fatal paper (If not prepared well)
4-Considering the difficulty levels, many candidates wont be able to pass papers like Public Ad, Sociology and English Literature

Guys what do you say, let's discuss..

You are predicting the unpredictable!

[QUOTE=GazaanKhan;1052961]You are predicting the unpredictable![/QUOTE]

Yes, exams like PCS itself is unpredictable. But we can discuss things considering the scoring trend what papers depict.

But Gaza Khan. I know your level well. Inshallah you will be among the allocated candidates. Must not forget the treat. :)

[QUOTE=Wonderworld;1052960]After going through all the papers, I predict that the following scoring trend will prevail in rescheduled CCE-2013 (2017).


[B]Scoring subjects[/B]
1-Applied Mathematics
2-Geographt
3-Human Anatomy
5-Zoology
6-Physics
7-Statistics
8-French
9-Islamiat


[B]Moderate scoring subjects[/B]
1-Commerce
2-Civil Law
3-European History
4-Indian History II
5-Political Science
6-Sindhi literature
7-Ethics and Psychology



[B]Slaughtering Subjects[/B]
1-Public Administration
2-Sociology
3-English Literature
4-Mass Communication
5-International Relations.


[B]Causes of failures can be:[/B]
1-In Essay, if no outlines are sketched
2-Possibilities can be failed in aggregate
3-GK can be fatal paper (If not prepared well)
4-Considering the difficulty levels, many candidates wont be able to pass papers like Public Ad, Sociology and English Literature

Guys what do you say, let's discuss..[/QUOTE]

Hey Bro, take a break.
U r going absolutely irrelevant.
First of all,I have no idea what made u draw that sketch. It's whimsical,anyways.
Subjects which u put in scring list have been low scoring in past.islamiat,applied maths nd geography proved nightmares.Many failed in thses subjects.Those who sailed through in these subjects ,most of them scored in between 60s and 80s. A few lucky people crossed 90 nd 100.
In ur moderate subjects chart,commerce remained low scoring.While,law,indopak,Sindhi yielded high scores.Psycholgy,eu.hsitry nd pool siences were average.
Why do u think sociology nd public ad would be disastrous?
Sociology is my optional ,it fetched me 100+ in poor nd unfortunate nul nd void attempt.The level of paper was not higher than that previous one.Same is true for public add. By d way,if content of a question is lengthy it doesn't mean the question would be difficult to answer.
And it is unfair of u not to give some place to the subjcts like Islamic histry,Persian language,arabic which can bring significant score.
To me, either G.k or English is going to be axed this time around.

[QUOTE=Lunatic bird;1052976]Hey Bro, take a break.
U r going absolutely irrelevant.
First of all,I have no idea what made u draw that sketch. It's whimsical,anyways.
Subjects which u put in scring list have been low scoring in past.islamiat,applied maths nd geography proved nightmares.Many failed in thses subjects.Those who sailed through in these subjects ,most of them scored in between 60s and 80s. A few lucky people crossed 90 nd 100.
In ur moderate subjects chart,commerce remained low scoring.While,law,indopak,Sindhi yielded high scores.Psycholgy,eu.hsitry nd pool siences were average.
Why do u think sociology nd public ad would be disastrous?
Sociology is my optional ,it fetched me 100+ in poor nd unfortunate nul nd void attempt.The level of paper was not higher than that previous one.Same is true for public add. By d way,if content of a question is lengthy it doesn't mean the question would be difficult to answer.
And it is unfair of u not to give some place to the subjcts like Islamic histry,Persian language,arabic which can bring significant score.
To me, either G.k or English is going to be axed this time around.[/QUOTE]

There is no hard and fast rule in rating the subjects. But Considering the difficulty level and unexpectedness in questions, we can easily analyze the scoring trend. Don't you think there are viable differences between the current and previous papers? As far as Geography and Commerce papers are concerned, please have a looke at the questions, most of the questions are like that of mathematics; I mean if you attempt them well, will fetch maximum marks unlike history and languages. Some topics are open to discuss in Sociology and Public Administration. If checker does accord, will award auspicious score and if not, can give low scores with sinking colours. Sociology paper is far difficult than that of last year because of its applications in the current trend. If you are good at discussing things with theory and application by incorporating the current examples, you will attain good score. Every candidate has its own level of intellect. You seem to be extra ordinary candidate and will get targeted scores.

I agree that Gk can be butchered but chances of aggregate failures are greater. English composition was not that difficult. As compare to previous composition paper, many candidates think that it was more easy except some idioms and adjective questions. So we can not rate English paper as slaughtering since the passing marks are just 33.

SPSC can play its filtering role in essays. They can fail candidates if not followed the directions. Most of the candidates have not given outlines in essay papers. So essay can be slaughtered as well.

Dear friends sorry to say that all your assumptions have nothing to do with the reality that is this that; there is no any concept of low or high marking. It is up to you if you attempted well you could get good numbers irrespect of subject issue but if you didn't do well in any of your paper whether so called high scoring you couldn't be able to fetch even passing marks.

[QUOTE=Raja Bahar;1053017]Dear friends sorry to say that all your assumptions have nothing to do with the reality that is this that; there is no any concept of low or high marking. It is up to you if you attempted well you could get good numbers irrespect of subject issue but if you didn't do well in any of your paper whether so called high scoring you couldn't be able to fetch even passing marks.[/QUOTE]

Haha
If that's the case then why folks were crying that they had been deliberately failed in Sindhi essay nd Islamic history 1.
I hope u would stick to ur words once the result is announced.

Dear that is not the point of discussion because that was deliberately done. It was a scam that is why apex court declared it null and void. Therefore there is no any rule in any way to intentionally fail the students in any subject.

But ur Apex court failed to provide any mechanism to restrict that practice of 'deliberately failing u' .There is no guarantee that it won't be repeated.
Those who were yelling once how dare SPSC failing us in our mother language ,are now saying that Sindhi general nd literature papers were the toughest of all. Dyooo munh hàany.😀