dear we have formed a group to work against this anti merit policy.plz contact me my f.b i.d is in my profile.and spread this msg to other candidates too.

Hyderabad me jo list lagi he wo ye zahir krti h. K education me ahal logon nh balke na ahel logon ko job do. I am on top in my uc i have done b.ed but unfortunately mera name list me nh tha. Halen k 62 walon k b name the . Allah kab in logon hidayat dega .jo logon hakook kha jate hen.

u can join us against this unjust policy and incompetent officers.

all toppers from hyd should forget about 10% taluka quota because the list comprises 122 names and remaining five seats are for disables and minority.total 127.

Just Think...........
 

[QUOTE=Priyagul;602729]Hyderabad me jo list lagi he wo ye zahir krti h. K education me ahal logon nh balke na ahel logon ko job do. I am on top in my uc i have done b.ed but unfortunately mera name list me nh tha. Halen k 62 walon k b name the . Allah kab in logon hidayat dega .jo logon hakook kha jate hen.[/QUOTE]

Dear, it might be an officail mistake by DRC of Hyd in the list of successfull candidates for appointment. But they have to share this final merit draft with RSU and World Bank as mentioned in "DRC Shedule" on RSU webiste. and you have to think that All candidates who succeed to secure a position in th list They have not given a single rupee bribe anyone to get job( I know many of them...) You can ask any person whose name is listed. whereas in previous appointments(in 2010 or 2011 dont know exact year) They picked less candidates than now in all hyderabad and the previous recruitment was made on district base..........................

[QUOTE=Capricorn87;602821]Dear, it might be an officail mistake by DRC of Hyd in the list of successfull candidates for appointment. But they have to share this final merit draft with RSU and World Bank as mentioned in "DRC Shedule" on RSU webiste. and you have to think that All candidates who succeed to secure a position in th list They have not given a single rupee bribe anyone to get job( I know many of them...) You can ask any person whose name is listed. whereas in previous appointments(in 2010 or 2011 dont know exact year) They picked less candidates than now in all hyderabad and the previous recruitment was made on district base..........................[/QUOTE]

baat ye nahe hai ke bribe dey kar job mil rahe hai baat ye hai ke merit based vacancies kyon nahe hain ye, ye new rule U.C wala nikala hai ye sahi nahe kyon ke kahein 80 marks walay ko job nahe mil rahi aur kahein 63 marks walay ko job mil rahe hai, ye na-insaafi per mabni policy hai, read this

[QUOTE=friendforu;602827]baat ye nahe hai ke bribe dey kar job mil rahe hai baat ye hai ke merit based vacancies kyon nahe hain ye, ye new rule U.C wala nikala hai ye sahi nahe kyon ke kahein 80 marks walay ko job nahe mil rahi aur kahein 63 marks walay ko job mil rahe hai, ye na-insaafi per mabni policy hai, read this

[/QUOTE]

I am not totaly disagree with you. but they mentioned it already that

"[B] Posting of JST will be made on UC basis subject to availability of need based vacncy." and

[B]" 10% posts in respect of JSTs will be filled on Taluka basis; rest will be UC specific appointment"[/B] ( I think here something need to clarify by DRC, Hyd.....)

"securing 60% marks is only passing criteria, it cannot gurantee someone entitled for job/appointment. The job given on the basis of need based vacancies."[/B]

[QUOTE=Capricorn87;602842]I am not totaly disagree with you. but they mentioned it already that

"[B] Posting of JST will be made on UC basis subject to availability of need based vacncy." and

[B]" 10% posts in respect of JSTs will be filled on Taluka basis; rest will be UC specific appointment"[/B] ( I think here something need to clarify by DRC, Hyd.....)

"securing 60% marks is only passing criteria, it cannot gurantee someone entitled for job/appointment. The job given on the basis of need based vacancies."[/B][/QUOTE]

sir,firstly hyd drc has not left anything for 10%.secondly,the policy itself is against merit as a candidate securing 75 marks has name in the list and other candidate having 86 marks have not placed in the list despite living in same taluka.finally if they are making u.c wise rule than all teachers of other district should be transferred to their district which is not possible.thus its ample to conclude that policy makers do not have any sense of merit so this policy should be canceled and recruitment should be made on district level.

Han jab dosre cities wale hamare city me transfer krwa k yahan job krenge to vacancy kaise niklegi. Na hame un k districts me job milegi or na apne district me. Koi kuch b kahe per ye policy bilkul galat he.

[QUOTE=Capricorn87;602842]I am not totaly disagree with you. but they mentioned it already that

"[B] Posting of JST will be made on UC basis subject to availability of need based vacncy." and

[B]" 10% posts in respect of JSTs will be filled on Taluka basis; rest will be UC specific appointment"[/B] ( I think here something need to clarify by DRC, Hyd.....)

"securing 60% marks is only passing criteria, it cannot gurantee someone entitled for job/appointment. The job given on the basis of need based vacancies."[/B][/QUOTE]

yes and we are saying this policy kills merit even if they have mentioned it already you cannot justify it!

Atleast there is hope to fight for 10 % taluka merit seats because they have declared this in the policy early.