v r more interested in offer letter then marks sheet. dont we Nasar ?

so guys dont go here and there, focus upon the issue of the offer letter, apprehended challenges , if it may be there and ways and means to tackle those.

hope the news of Muhammad Hussain of signature of CM is correct.

good luck and plz be focused on offer letters.

thanks.

[QUOTE=Asim Hassani;268778]v r more interested in offer letter then marks sheet. dont we Nasar ?

so guys dont go here and there, focus upon the issue of the offer letter, apprehended challenges , if it may be there and ways and means to tackle those.

hope the news of Muhammad Hussain of signature of CM is correct.

good luck and plz be focused on offer letters.

thanks.[/QUOTE]
Dear Asim...

I got this info of signature and offer letters from one of my friend today but since it was not confirmed so I did not post it. I have asked my several friends to verify news and as soon as the news is confirmed it will be posted. but I dont know the source Masood sahab.

You are right that for successful candidates right now the center of attention should be offer letters rather than marks sheets but it is human nature to know about his achievements..

Dear Nasar,

I hope that as soon as u get it confirmed from reliable sources tomorrow, u will let us know through this forum.

no update yet from anyone.

Today one of friends contacted the concerened section at S&GAD in person and was told that commission's recommendation were received in department but still not received in section for furthre progress [B]AND OUR FRIENDS R SAYING AT FORUM THAT CM HAS SIGNED THE SUMMARY ?????? [/B]

WHO IS CORRECT BROTHERS ????

[QUOTE=candidatespsc;269009]no update yet from anyone.

Today one of friends contacted the concerened section at S&GAD in person and was told that commission's recommendation were received in department but still not received in section for furthre progress [B]AND OUR FRIENDS R SAYING AT FORUM THAT CM HAS SIGNED THE SUMMARY ?????? [/B]

WHO IS CORRECT BROTHERS ????[/QUOTE]

SO MUCH OPPOSITE NEWS, ONE SAYS CM HAS SIGNED SUMMARY, SECOND SAYS SUMMARY SENT BY SPSC HAS NOT REACHED TO CONCERNED SECTION... :ohmy:

[B][U]MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN, WHERE R U BROTHER ?[/U][/B]

i received the info from two diffrnt sources but none was first hand info.
i appologize for posting unauthentic info.

[QUOTE=candidatespsc;269009]no update yet from anyone.

Today one of friends contacted the concerened section at S&GAD in person and was told that commission's recommendation were received in department but still not received in section for furthre progress [B]AND OUR FRIENDS R SAYING AT FORUM THAT CM HAS SIGNED THE SUMMARY ?????? [/B]

WHO IS CORRECT BROTHERS ????[/QUOTE]
Monday....21/02/2011....

Dear friends.......

Today I visited S&GAD and met with two persons who are on responsible positions and very close to the actual file of recommendations. following is the outcome of my meetings.....

...... File is still pending with the secretary services and has not been sent to CM on the reason that so far it has not been decided that where would be trained the newly recommended officers. S&GAD is trying to convince NIPA Karachi to train the officers... (Due to law and order situation of Peshawar)... but since this is a large batch and several courses are already underway at NIPA so there has been no positive response. while the PMS academy of Lahore has also been contacted and they are considering the option and will let the S&GAD know very soon. Once the academy is finalized the summary will be forwarded to CM for approval. After approval offer orders will be issued. It has also come to know that this time there will be common training of Ex-PCS and PSS group.

Dear friends although the file is still in S&GAD but there is no need to be panic. Our good friends are pursuing the case. So just relax and take good care of yourself. Your file is in good hands.

Thanks....

Assalamolaikum.

1. The reason told by the concerned people is really lame bcz at the time of issue of offer letter, there is no need to finalize the training place bcz after offer letter generally 14 days r given formally for acceptance and informally one more week , the acceptance is waited for then starts the procedure of appointment letters.

2. As far i knw there is no training academy at lahore for training of our provincial officers, it is only in peshawar and our previous two batches of DDORs and before it called Assistant commissioners were given training at Peshawar.

3. Training period is for one year, 6 months of academinc training in which focus is upon laws , rules and regulations and 6 months for UT ship , the practical exposure to the field. so there is no remote possibility of combined training of DDORs and SOs.

4. last CCE 2004-05, SOs were trained at NIPA and also sent to Bangladesh for one month while DDORs were gone to Peshawar.

5. It is first time that an Academy has started in Sindh at Tandojaam, lets C , possibly DDORs r supposed to be there for training. Choices r two either Peshawar or Tandojaam, nothing is there at karachi, lahore or Islamabad.

6. Combined training with SOs should be opposed bcz it will result either in increase of our training period or decrease of UT ship and both r unwanted and unwelcomed by us.

Corruption in cce2008 final result
 

anybody can check this corruption in cce 2008 final result.
look at these figures with open eyes.

1-roll.no. 1853 (sakkur-u) selected as section officer.
2- roll no. 11797 (sakkar-u) selected as DDO.
3-roll no.11766 (sakkar-u) selected as section officer.
4-roll no.10357 (Hyd-U) selected as section officer.

the above result is decleared by spsc.
now if we go to
[url]http://www.spsc.gov.pk/portal/Portals/0/PCS_Karachi_2008.pdf[/url]
and
[url]http://www.spsc.gov.pk/portal/Portals/0/PCS_Hyderabad_2008.pdf[/url]
we can essily find that
all the 4 candidates above do not belong to urban.they all from rural but spsc declare them as urban candidates.is this not corruption???????
this is extremely unfair

My dear friend
i belong to sukkur and i know mr nasar ullah mako roll no 1853 he lives in sukkur city.the problem is that before 2005 there were only one taulka of sukkur city i mean urban area but after 2005 another a new taulka known as new sukkur is established and announced as urban area means the sukkur city.so might be these all candidates belong to that area as they have got there domicile before 2005 as sindh r but now they are considered as sindh u by the notification of sindh govt in 2005.my dear there is nothing wrong but the lack of knowladge.

@fight
U r talking about JUST FOUR CHAPS?? You should carefully analyze the written result I'm sure you'll gonna die LOL

[QUOTE=ali110;269732]My dear friend
i belong to sukkur and i know mr nasar ullah mako roll no 1853 he lives in sukkur city.the problem is that before 2005 there were only one taulka of sukkur city i mean urban area but after 2005 another a new taulka known as new sukkur is established and announced as urban area means the sukkur city.so might be these all candidates belong to that area as they have got there domicile before 2005 as sindh r but now they are considered as sindh u by the notification of sindh govt in 2005.my dear there is nothing wrong but the lack of knowladge.[/QUOTE]


this is a serious issue. all what has been stated by u, must have been correct. Questions arise, if they had got their domicile before 2005, it must have been written there RURAL now did they get their domiciled changed ? or did they URBAQN DOMICILE in SPSC at the time of submission of form ? if yes so why SPSC mentioned them as Rural on Official Website ? and it they submitted their new URBAN domicile after interview or after passing the written part of exam so it is surely very very serious issue. more serious it becomes if the domicile has been acquire after the declarartion of the SPSC written part of the result ? very serious issue.

Assalamoalaikum:

Dear Nasar,

you had preapred the "Name List" of the recommended candidates with the help of the announced result and " List of the candidates " available on the website of the SPSC. why could you dont detect this blunder of changed domicile?

if " Taluka Change" is a reason for SUkkur candidates , what would one say abt Hyderabad candidate mentioned at serial number 4 of changed domicile case. Roll no.10357 (Hyd-U) selected as section officer.

SPSC must be ashamed of this incompetence.

This is for information of everyone that file has not reached CM as was claimed by various members here. In fact its with CS right now.

[QUOTE=Asim Hassani;270297]Assalamoalaikum:

Dear Nasar,

you had preapred the "Name List" of the recommended candidates with the help of the announced result and " List of the candidates " available on the website of the SPSC. why could you dont detect this blunder of changed domicile?

if " Taluka Change" is a reason for SUkkur candidates , what would one say abt Hyderabad candidate mentioned at serial number 4 of changed domicile case. Roll no.10357 (Hyd-U) selected as section officer.

SPSC must be ashamed of this incompetence.[/QUOTE]
Dear Asim....

there have been some changes in the districs of Sindh. Like Sukkur, Hyderabad was also bifurcated. I think there may not be [B]"curroption"[/B] as far as the domicile is concerned. However, the concerned candidates can best answer the question. Meanwhile, [B]I will request the forum members to be mature enough and dont create hype of each and everything.[/B] SPSC is not a childish institute, it must have scrutinized these things according to its rules. I know Nasrullah Mako. He had also passed one written test conducted by FPSC. (I dont remember the name). However, if anyone has doubt, it is his /her right to contest this issue before SPSC authorities, meanwhile I would request the forum members to be careful in leveling allegations against a person or authority.

Thanks and take care.

Nasrullah mako
 

I know mr nasrullah mako personally. He is a deserving and meritorious candidate. He has already been serving in ASF as inspector (he was selected by FPSC on sindh u domicile). Only spsc should be blamed for these types of, mentioned in above posts, errors. I think the result announced by spsc is fair and on merit. We could not be allocated because we were down in the merit list. Now it is of no use to cry over split milk.

Dear Nasar,

nobody is criticizing u and nobody favours that hype should be created. It was a simple question from one brother that is legitimate that when u prepared the list of recommended candidates , u must have seen the names in candidates' list available on website, so this difference of domicile should have been noted by u as u r intelligent enough.

SPSC , specially after the experience of Last CCE is extra cautuous and i m of the opinion that result is purely on merit, if a candidate submits his new domicile to SPSC , the SPSC is bound to deal that as per rules and nobody believes that SPSC might have done something wrong , specially in this type of active judiciary and experience of last CCE.

u r right the not SPSC but those candidate have to clarify their positions and the person, among those four , who has been recommended as DDO has high merit ( any one can check result), had he not had the domicile of URBAN, even then he would have been recommended on RURAL domicile.

pointing out individual and clerical mistakes is neither aimed at creating doubts over the result. Result is on merit and and we are very humbly thank ALLAH on this blessing.

u have topped and thats y everybody looks towards u for help and any explanation that one needs.

Take care.

[QUOTE=candidatespsc;270555]Dear Nasar,

nobody is criticizing u and nobody favours that hype should be created. It was a simple question from one brother that is legitimate that when u prepared the list of recommended candidates , u must have seen the names in candidates' list available on website, so this difference of domicile should have been noted by u as u r intelligent enough.

SPSC , specially after the experience of Last CCE is extra cautuous and i m of the opinion that result is purely on merit, if a candidate submits his new domicile to SPSC , the SPSC is bound to deal that as per rules and nobody believes that SPSC might have done something wrong , specially in this type of active judiciary and experience of last CCE.

u r right the not SPSC but those candidate have to clarify their positions and the person, among those four , who has been recommended as DDO has high merit ( any one can check result), had he not had the domicile of URBAN, even then he would have been recommended on RURAL domicile.

pointing out individual and clerical mistakes is neither aimed at creating doubts over the result. Result is on merit and and we are very humbly thank ALLAH on this blessing.

u have topped and thats y everybody looks towards u for help and any explanation that one needs.

Take care.[/QUOTE]
Dear Candidatespsc......

Thanks for complement. I am an ordinary person and a good friend of all of you. When I had prepared the list I put the domicile as per final result of the interviews, because there were some errors in the seat numbers list: like some students were written shia, hindu and some mistakes of surname also, therefore, I considered the final result as far as domicile is concerned.

Dear would you share your result, if you like to?

Thanks and take good care of yourself.

[QUOTE=dr.ali.zaidi;270316]This is for information of everyone that file has not reached CM as was claimed by various members here. In fact its with CS right now.[/QUOTE]


Dear Ali, How much authentic the news is.

[QUOTE=Asim Hassani;270749]Dear Ali, How much authentic the news is.[/QUOTE]

Very much authentic

Assalamoalaikum.

where r u guys ? no news is good news but no news for 2 / 3 days might not

be good news. So whats update dear brothers?

[QUOTE=Asim Hassani;272516]Assalamoalaikum.

where r u guys ? no news is good news but no news for 2 / 3 days might not

be good news. So whats update dear brothers?[/QUOTE]
Dear Friends......

Delay in offer letters by S&GAD is against the interest of recommended candidates. before the issuance of offer orders if mukhtiar kars and lower secretarial staff is promoted as DDO R and SO respectively than they will be senior to all of us. This is a very serious issue and something is to be done.

To be or not to be, that is the question!!!!
 

[QUOTE=Nasar Abbasi;272736]Dear Friends......

Delay in offer letters by S&GAD is against the interest of recommended candidates. before the issuance of offer orders if mukhtiar kars and lower secretarial staff is promoted as DDO R and SO respectively than they will be senior to all of us. This is a very serious issue and something is to be done.[/QUOTE]

Yes you are absolutely right that 'the delay' since the inception of CCE2008 is against the interest of candidates. Anyway, what is to be done? What policy be adopted to convey all qualifiers' resentment to S&GAD? It is said that this delay is usual, i don't know about the veracity of this claim but seeing the whole process of CCE 2008 it appears that the statement could probably be correct.

Dear Nasar.

what is the status of file now ?
when did our karachi friends visit the S&GAD last time ?

Imtiaz khushk, Muhammad Hussain, Nasar Abbasi, Ali Zaidi, Shamoon, Ali110, MB Dharejo.


where r u all ? why silence has prevailed here ? does any one of you have no news ? is nobody following what has been going on with the matter of offer letter ? :confused:

Status Quo
 

Dear Friends,

The official news is as usual; status quo. Today's official update from a very authentic source is that President is in Karachi and all the government officials are seemingly busy in executing President's order. The 'file' has come to an exact halt in the SG&AD's bottomless pit. Let's wait and hope for President to go back to capital and file restarts its journey again.

Tomorrow I will further update all members about the 'fate' of the file. Use also other sources to dig up the truth.

Thanks,

[QUOTE=candidatespsc;273568]Imtiaz khushk, Muhammad Hussain, Nasar Abbasi, Ali Zaidi, Shamoon, Ali110, MB Dharejo.


where r u all ? why silence has prevailed here ? does any one of you have no news ? is nobody following what has been going on with the matter of offer letter ? :confused:[/QUOTE]
dear all friends......

we all recommended candidates are in touch through each others' friends. It has come to know that the delay is a deliberate act so that rankers be given promotions and after than the offer letters will be issued. we consider this a serious issue and discussing the options so that a coordinated step be taken to tackle the issue of seniority. friends in different cities are having meetings. any one in Karachi please send his/her contact details on the following email address. [email]abbasinasar@hotmail.com[/email]

Thanks and take care.

Sindh , My motherland, how unfortunate u are!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Province is without IG and CS and our Chief Executive of Province is 80+ who spends his most of the time in ................................

ohhhhhhhhhh, Sindhuuuuuuuuuu, v all r waiting for Hoshu , who comes and let merit be the order of the day....

Shamoon :
where is the update u stated to give us in ur last post ?

Dr.Ali.zaidi
Any " authentic news" ???

It is to inform you all , that today I have visited the S & GAD department and I was surprise to know that our recommendation summary is yet to be forwarded by SPSC. I recheck this from Sindh Public Service Commission where one officer told me the same story that the recommendation summary of the PCS candidates is still pending with the commission.:angry:

[QUOTE=asimkhan;276700]It is to inform you all , that today I have visited the S & GAD department and I was surprise to know that our recommendation summary is yet to be forwarded by SPSC. I recheck this from Sindh Public Service Commission where one officer told me the same story that the recommendation summary of the PCS candidates is still pending with the commission.:angry:[/QUOTE]
I have in my hands the copies of letters sent by SPSC to S&GAD and other departments..... recommendation have been sent by SPSC more than one month ago.....

Summary has been sent by SPSC but yet to be signed by secretary and CM and then CS.

Can anybody tell how long this process will take?

Spsc has not sent any summary but our recommendations to S&GAD which were received there in R&I ( Receipt and Inward ) section and were sent to the Chief Secretary sb, since then it is with CS sb. no movement is there. CS will send recommendations of SPSC to Secretary Services and from there it will go to comcerned section which will make proposal to issue offer letter and those proposal via Secretary Services will go to CS and CS will send it to CM sb and after approval it will come back to CS again and again via Secretay Services it will come to section which will issue offer letter and then comes the procedure of appointment letter. so dear friends , i m afraid, it will take atleast 3 / 4 months.

[QUOTE=Nasar Abbasi;276775]I have in my hands the copies of letters sent by SPSC to S&GAD and other departments..... recommendation have been sent by SPSC more than one month ago.....[/QUOTE]


Dear Nasar,

can u post the letters of SPSC referred above , on forum, in scanned form for the information of others ?

Friends

I have periodically consultation with SPSC officials and Asst: Controller of Exams has told me that SPSC recommendations are dispatched to S & GD one month prior. :bow

[QUOTE=MBA;267662]I'll request to above members to act like matures, conquering the battle has not come to an end, life is not just to pass css or pcs, its beyond that!!!!

I wonder how could you people be so bias in supporting your own view and insulting the other? Yes you have right to deny or give your arguments like "BabaKhan" is providing arguments here, neither he is sarcastic nor indecent to anyone yet. I will request you guys to act as decent members because it is leaving bad impression on aspirants like us.

Hope you guys will take it as friendly advise, If i am failed to explain my point, I will try it once again as we are here to learn.

Regards,[/QUOTE]
Dear Shaikh Sahab, urf MBA, as I remember, you had once maintained that bureaucrats sit like dogs before their political masters. When you can go to this limit of adopting uncivlised attitude, there is no reason left for you to visit the threads exclusively reserved for bureaucracies.

Before you point your fingers again, make it sure that your own hands are clean at first place.

:bow:bowWATCH THIS VIDEO.you will find the answer.why DDO are not getting offer letters.
[youtube]63RKO41p2_8[/youtube]

[QUOTE=pcss;277591]Dear Shaikh Sahab, urf MBA, as I remember, you had once maintained that bureaucrats sit like dogs before their political masters. When you can go to this limit of adopting uncivlised attitude, there is no reason left for you to visit the threads exclusively reserved for bureaucracies.

Before you point your fingers again, make it sure that your own hands are clean at first place.[/QUOTE]

Dear Pcss, I am shocked to see your this comment, you seem quite learned and mature person but you are acting opposite, kindly direct me to the post where I've mentioned the "dog" thing, then, even If I have committed some mistake that doesn't mean I will never speak against the wrong?

We are here to learn and respect, not to fight, arguments is welcome :P

Peace.

@ MBA

could you plz answer some ques in banking & finance section (post named as "answers reuired") its important

Hafiz sb, answering there.

conrtatulations
 

@ Dr Imtiaz Khushk

I would like to congratulate to all the PCS qualifiers and specially to Dr Imtiaz Sahb that you at last made it.:8:

Regards

Zahid Iqbal