Thursday, April 25, 2024
04:11 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Sindh Public Service Commission > SPSC Other Examinations

SPSC Other Examinations Sindh Public Service Commission

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #11  
Old Wednesday, November 09, 2016
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: karaachi
Posts: 143
Thanks: 64
Thanked 159 Times in 90 Posts
Lunatic bird is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenboat View Post
Getting qualified legally in your sense under illigal honcho chairman is all patrified that you are unaware about surrounding what is going on in the meanwhile. Ultimate authority is the apex court which will do the justice of legalness PCS exam in near future. The supreme court will not let go the furtive attempts of blue eyed candidates in the SPSC.
Let's see bro.
However, there is no precedent in judicial history of pakistan in which the steps of an authority had been rovoked after he was declared ineligible by court.There are examples of justice dogar and ex p.m Yousaf Raza gilani.Both of them were declared ineligible for the posts but all their decisions and passed acts remained intact .Its the fault sindh govt who appointed them,not of candidates who appeared in exams.So,govt has to bear the burnt of supreme court's rulings,not probably the candidates.
Indeed,some hidden hands are trying to harm cce 13 because it is mostly merit based this time around,neverthless,qualifiers trust the impartiality and justice of supreme court..
__________________
"Believe you can and you're halfway there"
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Thursday, November 10, 2016
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Larkana
Posts: 69
Thanks: 19
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Javed Ahmed Abbasi is on a distinguished road
Default

I think no one should have the issue with the allocated friends. whatsoever the decision comes everyone should be ready for that.
However if you remember that FPSC had re-examined the CSS exam of Faisalabad Center,for the seeming meager reason of late arrival of answer copies. it was the fault of the Pak Post,yet FPSC finding it against its criteria, re-conducted the exam.
So dear friends we should not be panic. SC is in better position to resolve the issue.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Thursday, November 10, 2016
Greenboat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,556
Thanks: 950
Thanked 397 Times in 315 Posts
Greenboat is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Javed Ahmed Abbasi View Post
I think no one should have the issue with the allocated friends. whatsoever the decision comes everyone should be ready for that.
However if you remember that FPSC had re-examined the CSS exam of Faisalabad Center,for the seeming meager reason of late arrival of answer copies. it was the fault of the Pak Post,yet FPSC finding it against its criteria, re-conducted the exam.
So dear friends we should not be panic. SC is in better position to resolve the issue.
In CSS 2013, since the paper was reconducted, the FPSC did justice to all of the candidates, most of the candidates were passed in essay paper. It was the toil of FPSC in speedy justice by its own. The case of outrageous SPSC is another one and can not be resmbled with. If the Supreme court absolve SPSC, then the qualiferes must be not harmed a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old Thursday, November 10, 2016
Greenboat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,556
Thanks: 950
Thanked 397 Times in 315 Posts
Greenboat is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunatic bird View Post
Let's see bro.
However, there is no precedent in judicial history of pakistan in which the steps of an authority had been rovoked after he was declared ineligible by court.There are examples of justice dogar and ex p.m Yousaf Raza gilani.Both of them were declared ineligible for the posts but all their decisions and passed acts remained intact .Its the fault sindh govt who appointed them,not of candidates who appeared in exams.So,govt has to bear the burnt of supreme court's rulings,not probably the candidates.
Indeed,some hidden hands are trying to harm cce 13 because it is mostly merit based this time around,neverthless,qualifiers trust the impartiality and justice of supreme court..

It is 2016 and now things are not same as that of Dogar and Yousif Raza Gilani's tenure. Now no official can do rampant corruption openly, if he does, he has to do it at his own peril. Since the Supreme court asked for all records, in the meanwhile, the high court also took part in this matter and frozen all the activities of SPSC and in addition with it justified the viva voce of CCE2013 null & void. On the other hand, the CM asked the corrupt members of SPSC for resignations. Because the Sindh government don't want to indulge with the apex institution on account of its political resplendent.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old Thursday, November 10, 2016
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: karaachi
Posts: 143
Thanks: 64
Thanked 159 Times in 90 Posts
Lunatic bird is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenboat View Post
It is 2016 and now things are not same as that of Dogar and Yousif Raza Gilani's tenure. Now no official can do rampant corruption openly, if he does, he has to do it at his own peril. Since the Supreme court asked for all records, in the meanwhile, the high court also took part in this matter and frozen all the activities of SPSC and in addition with it justified the viva voce of CCE2013 null & void. On the other hand, the CM asked the corrupt members of SPSC for resignations. Because the Sindh government don't want to indulge with the apex institution on account of its political resplendent.
Oh My Goodness! U r living in fool's paradise dear without any authentic news .You must have read "Sobh"news's fake report about verdict of Sindh high court tegarding CCE 2013.Sindh high court has not declared interviews null and void ,it has just issued notices to chairman SPSC and Chief Secretary to submit their comments against allegations raised by petitioners.The allegation is about exclusion of minority,women and disabled qouta in final result.To be logical,if high court proceeds for any decree in this regard,it should be to include these qoutas rather the cancelation of interviews.Better consult an authentic source about this matter,don't creat confusion here on the basis of a fake news which is viral on social media nowadays.
And U r talking abt 2016,let me tell u Chairman of Baluchistan public service commission was arrested in 2016 after allegations proved against him for making a series of illegal recruitments. He was charged for the corruption he made but appointments made by him remained intact.So,we hope nothing adverse is going to happen to the fate of qualifiers of cce 13 and other recruitment by the previous chairman.
On humanitarian grounds,I pray that God will protect recruitments.These are in thousands ,supreme court will analyse all the possible repercussions of a strict decision in this matter.
And for u, kindly avoid airing rumours ,come with a sort of authencity.
Jazakullah.!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Javed Ahmed Abbasi View Post
I think no one should have the issue with the allocated friends. whatsoever the decision comes everyone should be ready for that.
However if you remember that FPSC had re-examined the CSS exam of Faisalabad Center,for the seeming meager reason of late arrival of answer copies. it was the fault of the Pak Post,yet FPSC finding it against its criteria, re-conducted the exam.
So dear friends we should not be panic. SC is in better position to resolve the issue.
That reason was not meagre bro.Not only late arrival was noticed,but tempering with answer sheets was proved.It was a big scandel ,that's why fpsc had to re-examine .Here case is different, case is about ineligibility of chairman and some members rather than any any malpractices made in recruitnents.So, as per legal facts the authorities who appointed them should be penalized.candidates are faultless here.We were not supposed to ask chairman whether he was eligible for conducting our interviews.That would be ironical and against the rules of natural justice if some one is punished for the mistake of someone else.
__________________
"Believe you can and you're halfway there"

Last edited by incounternable; Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 10:28 AM. Reason: chain posts merged
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old Thursday, November 10, 2016
Greenboat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,556
Thanks: 950
Thanked 397 Times in 315 Posts
Greenboat is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunatic bird View Post
Oh My Goodness! U r living in fool's paradise dear without any authentic news .You must have read "Sobh"news's fake report about verdict of Sindh high court tegarding CCE 2013.Sindh high court has not declared interviews null and void ,it has just issued notices to chairman SPSC and Chief Secretary to submit their comments against allegations raised by petitioners.The allegation is about exclusion of minority,women and disabled qouta in final result.To be logical,if high court proceeds for any decree in this regard,it should be to include these qoutas rather the cancelation of interviews.Better consult an authentic source about this matter,don't creat confusion here on the basis of a fake news which is viral on social media nowadays.
And U r talking abt 2016,let me tell u Chairman of Baluchistan public service commission was arrested in 2016 after allegations proved against him for making a series of illegal recruitments. He was charged for the corruption he made but appointments made by him remained intact.So,we hope nothing adverse is going to happen to the fate of qualifiers of cce 13 and other recruitment by the previous chairman.
On humanitarian grounds,I pray that God will protect recruitments.These are in thousands ,supreme court will analyse all the possible repercussions of a strict decision in this matter.
And for u, kindly avoid airing rumours ,come with a sort of authencity.
Jazakullah.!
I strongly agree with you that I am living in fool's paradise. Don't get startled you will get your job. The court has frozen all activities including the offer orders which are dispatched to the candidates, all are null & void till the adjustment of minority and women quotas in addition with the courts assessment to the corrupt blue eyed candidates. Things are not purly clear by now, just wait and you will come to know all what happens next.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old Thursday, November 10, 2016
naheed Akhtar's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Sukkur-Sindh
Posts: 127
Thanks: 49
Thanked 89 Times in 55 Posts
naheed Akhtar is on a distinguished road
Default

though I didn't clear written part of the exam but I don't endorse this decision.. can anyone provide link to this news ?
__________________
'fa inna ma'al usri yusra.'
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old Thursday, November 10, 2016
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: karaachi
Posts: 143
Thanks: 64
Thanked 159 Times in 90 Posts
Lunatic bird is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by naheed Akhtar View Post
though I didn't clear written part of the exam but I don't endorse this decision.. can anyone provide link to this news ?
Consult newspapers of Nov 03 and 04.
It is published in most of the Sindhi newspapers.
But its not clearly about null and void status of cce

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenboat View Post
I strongly agree with you that I am living in fool's paradise. Don't get startled you will get your job. The court has frozen all activities including the offer orders which are dispatched to the candidates, all are null & void till the adjustment of minority and women quotas in addition with the courts assessment to the corrupt blue eyed candidates. Things are not purly clear by now, just wait and you will come to know all what happens next.
Haha.Here u come with still a confused logic again! " Null and Void till the adjustment" .Does such a thing really exist in law.?Null and void is something which brings down a process to zero. U don't have to adjust if a null and void decision comes,its over then,no existence at all.
Nevertheless,let me clear things here to avoid people getting messed.
1.In a response of sou moto action against ineligibility of spsc chairman SC has stopped SPSC from further selections till the case is resolved.Owing to dysfunctional status of SPSC supreme has ordered sindh govt to halt the process of ongoing recommendations by the SPSC .Apex court has also ordered sindh govt to present list of all recommendees by spsc during bhanwer's chairmanship. Hopefully, in next hearing SC will order sindh govt to reconstitute spsc and proceed with its recommendations..
2.Some people have filed petition in sindh high court alleging that spsc has ignored minority and women quota in selections through cce 2013. In this regard, court has sent notices to chairman spsc and chief secretary to submit their stance against mentioned allegations.
CRUX: SC has halted the process of inductions due to dysfunctional status of spsc.High court has issued notices to spsc and CS for comments against allegations.
Nothing more than this has happened yet.
__________________
"Believe you can and you're halfway there"

Last edited by incounternable; Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 10:29 AM. Reason: chain posts merged
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lunatic bird For This Useful Post:
Greenboat (Thursday, November 10, 2016)
  #19  
Old Thursday, November 10, 2016
Greenboat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,556
Thanks: 950
Thanked 397 Times in 315 Posts
Greenboat is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunatic bird View Post
Haha.Here u come with still a confused logic again! " Null and Void till the adjustment" .Does such a thing really exist in law.?Null and void is something which brings down a process to zero. U don't have to adjust if a null and void decision comes,its over then,no existence at all.
Nevertheless,let me clear things here to avoid people getting messed.
1.In a response of sou moto action against ineligibility of spsc chairman SC has stopped SPSC from further selections till the case is resolved.Owing to dysfunctional status of SPSC supreme has ordered sindh govt to halt the process of ongoing recommendations by the SPSC .Apex court has also ordered sindh govt to present list of all recommendees by spsc during bhanwer's chairmanship. Hopefully, in next hearing SC will order sindh govt to reconstitute spsc and proceed with its recommendations..
2.Some people have filed petition in sindh high court alleging that spsc has ignored minority and women quota in selections through cce 2013. In this regard, court has sent notices to chairman spsc and chief secretary to submit their stance against mentioned allegations.
CRUX: SC has halted the process of inductions due to dysfunctional status of spsc.High court has issued notices to spsc and CS for comments against allegations.
Nothing more than this has happened yet.
Haha No, it is not a confusion but quandary :d
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old Wednesday, December 14, 2016
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Shikarpur
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Vicky is on a distinguished road
Default

What is going on?
Why the further process of SPSC recommended candidates is halted???
__________________
wHen iT coMes tO moNey everYbody iS oF tHe sAme reliGion
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Asma Jilani ---- Vs---- Govt. of the Punjab sajidnuml Constitutional Law 5 Saturday, November 11, 2017 06:00 PM
Mercantile Law Prepartion letsfly Mercantile Law 2 Sunday, May 11, 2014 01:13 PM
The constitution of the islamic republic of pakistan, 1973[1] IMTIAZ AHMAD KHAN Constitutional Law 0 Thursday, February 14, 2013 05:40 PM
Timeline: Judiciary vs executive Call for Change Current Affairs 0 Tuesday, June 19, 2012 06:14 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.