Originally Posted by Raja Bahar

Hearing from sources that a Shaikh Sahib is going to be appointed as a new SPSC chairman but can't confirm that is why not writing his name.

Originally Posted by incounternable

This is for all.

Imagine you were the qualifier who lost his appointment just because there were some people who, supposedly, came through illegal means. Wouldn't you want that those responsible for such huge loss of yourself be punished instead of putting you at misery ?

Wouldn't you want them out ? The thing is there is really no proof about it. There were irregualritites, there is no denying that but if courts had proof of malpractice, as depicted here in many posts, then why didn't the Honourable court put those criminals behind the bars ?

Just ask yourself, if you lost your precious struggle of 4 years in just 4 months of trial without proof of malpractice, wouldn't you protest ?

Protesting for justice is their right so let them protest and file for review. Stop taunting them or demoralizing them.

We don't know what would happen next so why fight with each other ?

I morally support every qualifier because many deserving candidates lost their jobs and other numerous opportunitites for the sake of this unfortunate exam.


JazakAllah

Originally Posted by suhail khoso

Yes they did l0ose their j0bs dear but still they have g0t that chance and may be this time transperency level increase s0 why d0nt we supp0rt merit instead of enhancing culprit pe0ple and there were many flaws in written to0 i saw many deserving 0ut 0f c0mpetation

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by incounternable

You wouldn't understand their position unless you were one of them.

These all things are based on hearsay. If the court had such proof those culprits would have been behind bars by now.

And stop saying they can do it again. No same candidate can make it to the final list everytime, no matter how competent he/she is. There are many factors involved. Just because written failures get to have another go, doesn't mean it is a just decision. You may call it a historic decision(because its unprecendented) but not a just decision.



JazakAllah

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Greenboat

Objection my lord!

with due respect I strongly dont agree with you. If a candidate is really competent, he will not only pass but can score more as compare to previous one. So everyone has capacity of same chance. Some qualifiers are crying over spilt milk and they put their degrees on fire.How sad!! My lord! I am not sating all qualifiers are culprit, but if only "one" qualifier is culprit, is injustice to all of guys. My lord! In Quran (5:30), it is said by Allah Tabarak Watallah that whosoever killed a person. It shall be as if he had killed whole mankind. Similarly, injistice with even one candidate, is shall be as if it has injustice to all candidate.

Originally Posted by incounternable

Objection over ruled !

Not necessarily. Many CSS toppers in one year failed next year.

http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-dates...-2015-too.html

The second point is exactly what I stated in my earlier post that those involved in malpractice should be punished and not all of them.


JazakAllah

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Greenboat

I object My lorddd!!!

Roz hoti hai is ruswai kay case ki sunwai.. I object! Or roz yehi faisla sunaya jata hai! Sons and daughters of poor people urf unemployeed! Gareeb awam is guilty! and it is ruled by waderas till death!!!

No Objection over rule my lord!!!!!!!

Originally Posted by incounternable

What exactly is your objection ?

I'm saying the same thing that if there were candidates who were involved in malpractice, they should have been punished and not all of the candidates.


About candidates who top one exam in one year are not necessarily supposed to top the same exam again. I shared a few instances too through that thread.


JazakAllah

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Greenboat

New chairman is taking charges of his job.