Friday, April 19, 2024
09:30 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Sindh Public Service Commission > SPSC Other Examinations

SPSC Other Examinations Sindh Public Service Commission

View Poll Results: pcs-cce-2008?
pcs cce-2008 0 0%
pcs cce-2008 0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Friday, July 10, 2009
DR IMTIAZ KHUSHIK's Avatar
Section Officer
PMS / PCS Award: Serving PMS / PCS (BS 17) officers are eligible only. - Issue reason: SPSC CCE 2009 - Roll no. 8615
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Presidential Palace
Posts: 181
Thanks: 46
Thanked 45 Times in 38 Posts
DR IMTIAZ KHUSHIK is on a distinguished road
Default PCS-combined Compitative Exam -2008

Can any budy tell about the current status of PCS-combined Compitative Exam 2008????/
Is there A ray Of hope For Justice In This Attempt?
Even though I Passed CCE-2003, But did not Witness seriousness in interviewers.



DR IMTIAZ KHUSHIK
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Friday, July 10, 2009
38th CTP (PSP)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: Merit 19, CE 2008
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: CSA lahore, shabirsethar@hotmail.com shabir sethar@facebook.com
Posts: 47
Thanks: 29
Thanked 82 Times in 36 Posts
shabeersethar is on a distinguished road
Default Pcs 2008

Even though I Passed CCE-2003, But did not Witness seriousness in interviewers.


Dear may i know what is seriousness to u.i believe spsc upheld neritocracy in pcs 2003.classic example is 12 to 15 have qualified css 2003 to 2008.fuad soomro.jahanzeb,mahesar,fayaz abasi.fayaz jatoi,farukh,ata shah.saif abro.imran qureshi.fawad shah nd me too.besides 30 guys among 77 were qualifiers but could nt be allocated groups.
Bro, we need to strengthen institutions rather then undermine those.


SHABIR SETHAR

Last edited by Xeric; Monday, August 24, 2009 at 01:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to shabeersethar For This Useful Post:
Adil Memon (Friday, July 10, 2009), F.S. (Friday, July 10, 2009), REEYAN (Friday, July 10, 2009)
  #3  
Old Friday, July 10, 2009
F.S.'s Avatar
37th Common
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2008 - Merit 112
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: KHI
Posts: 94
Thanks: 19
Thanked 167 Times in 60 Posts
F.S. will become famous soon enough
Default

I m seconding d views of Shabir Sethar
__________________
You'll never walk alone
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Monday, August 24, 2009
DR IMTIAZ KHUSHIK's Avatar
Section Officer
PMS / PCS Award: Serving PMS / PCS (BS 17) officers are eligible only. - Issue reason: SPSC CCE 2009 - Roll no. 8615
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Presidential Palace
Posts: 181
Thanks: 46
Thanked 45 Times in 38 Posts
DR IMTIAZ KHUSHIK is on a distinguished road
Default shabir sethar needs ur comments

KARACHI: The discrepancies on massive scale have been revealed in Sindh Public Service Commission (SPSC) Examinations 2003 in which the close relatives of SPSC and government officials declared successful instead of successful candidates after tempering the results.

According to report, 2555 candidates took part in SPSC examinations 2003 for grade 16 and 17 posts among which 531 candidates declared successful in written test and after interview, total 77 announced successful.

A youth Saleem Sheikh had challenged the results in Sindh High Court against tempering in results.

A three-member committee consists of Chairman Shah Mansoor Alam and Abrar Hussain Mirza and Nawaz Ali Leghari had been formed to investigate the issue. Sources said that the committee after rechecking of the copies has disclosed that many candidates among 77 are failed but they had been declared successful after tempering in the results whereas copies of two candidates Ayan Mustafa Bhutto and Dr. Nisar A Leghari are missing. Large number of successful candidates are the children of government officials.

The evidences indicated the involvement of high officials of SPSC and control examination Umar Zor in the whole process.

According to sources, 47 candidates declared successful were failed and currently all of them serving duties at key government posts after passing six years.

The enquiry committee recommended to declare SPSC examinations 2003 results as void and consider the entire examination process of 2003 as forge and illegal.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Monday, August 24, 2009
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sindh
Posts: 230
Thanks: 55
Thanked 109 Times in 74 Posts
Babakhan is on a distinguished road
Default

I, not at all, agree with the way Sethar and FS are defending the credibility of CCE-2003. Passing CSS later doesn't guarantee that passer of those exams or else were not involve in corrupt ways for induction. Whole CCE 2003 EXAM should be made null and void and all vacated seats must be merged in CCE-2008. Further more, after strict scrutiny those who passed written exams should be allowed to present themselves before impartial board.

Regards
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Current Affairs Sureshlasi Current Affairs 60 Tuesday, May 12, 2020 01:45 PM
How to reduce exam anxiety amy General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 9 Monday, April 11, 2016 11:41 PM
Heads of State, President, Prime Minister and Cabinet Members Sureshlasi International Relations 29 Saturday, July 28, 2012 11:38 AM
FPSC Recruitment Tests safdarmehmood General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 2 Sunday, January 25, 2009 05:38 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.