Advocates of CEE-2003
 

Many a times I tried to pose this matter of gross injustice before forum but in vein because of those so called advocates of CEE-2003. They came up with silly arguments and diverted the attention of forum from this core issue of gross misconduct. Even people were advocating the case of Ahyan Bhuto that, is to me, was the murder of meritocracy and Gunda Raaj of Chairman.

Regards

[QUOTE=Babakhan]Many a times I tried to pose this matter of gross injustice before forum but in vein because of those so called advocates of CEE-2003. They came up with silly arguments and diverted the attention of forum from this core issue of gross misconduct. Even people were advocating the case of Ahyan Bhuto that, is to me, was the murder of meritocracy and Gunda Raaj of Chairman.

Regards[/QUOTE]
brother!remember,zoom bhuto had always supported you.
as for as meritocracy is concerned;you can not expect it more than 50% in spsc.anyways,even fpsc is 95% transparent.
brother! this is pakistan,not australia.think about it.

Ada, I'm not all against SPSC and don't even expect them to practice 100% merit. We all in Pakistan are prone to such an environment where 60% Merit-40% Chakker Bazi chalta hai but SPSC ne to had he kerdi. They declared 47 failed candidates passed and didn't bother asking them to at least pass the written portion. I don't know for this sake how many passed students they might have failed and those who qualified the written portion were only there for khana puri. Thankfully current management of SPSC has taken up this issue and they will definitely going to practice a certain level of meritocracy in CCE2009. Fingers are crossed!!

Regards