My two-cents: Criticism, Objection or Endorsement is Welcome.

Extremists vs. "the" Extremists.

He is bearded, with a turban and a script stubbornly conservative. He appears unlike the mainstream. Retains an apathy towards change. He is barbaric and a hard cookie. And then is you, a modernist, (pseudo-) liberal, (quasi-) humanist and (bogus-) rightist. You have a much common façade. You too have another, the third one, philosophy of your own. In your dictionary the definition of life is entirely different to what is conventional. Not surprisingly, there is merely a difference of appearance between “You” and “Him”. Both of “you and him” are the contractors of humanity and religion respectively. Rigidly absorbed in self-modeled cults of your own. You are a heretic; he, a malevolent zealot.
Today, religious radicals are assumed to be the sole force behind this crisis found in our midst. This approach, however, reflects a sad state of so-called rational-cum-logical interpretation of things. It suggests that the ‘reason and logic’ that are believed to be the bedrock of modern interpretation of this ‘modern man’ are merely the substitute terms of ‘partiality and bias’. In fact, without any wonders, the religious zealots and extremists are the one side of the coin. The other side are the hedonists in shape of liberals and modernists. Whom cultural and religious values that confine their sensual and earthly urges are expired and, therefore, inapplicable to the contemporary humans.
Liberalism is a philosophy that preserves an impartial insight of the beliefs and thoughts held by others. These beliefs through the lenses of liberalism are treated and responded with reverence. However, the heretical face of modern liberals implies a contradictory version of real ‘liberalism’.
Religious fanatics, normally, have no respect or tolerance for the values and needs of the modern man. They abandon the notion of change and are in a way or other deeply absorbed in rigid orthodoxy. They maintain that conservatism is a befitting order that can suitably be adjusted into the social, political and all other factors of life of modern man and is the only best possible solution to all human problems. Similarly, tolerance of ideas and beliefs is also alien to the mentality of the ‘other kind of extremists’ especially in practical terms. They exploit the cloak of ‘liberal values’ to cover their unethical and immoral activities doused into sensualism. Therefore, much of the havoc found in today’s world is more a ‘consequence’ of what these two cults act and react to one another.
Religious extremists are often and rightly condemned because of their tendency of implementing headstrong conservative set of ideas in a forcible manner. They cavalierly refute the concept of adaptability. Change is altogether unfamiliar to them. However, a similar propensity is found from those bogus-liberals when they denounce and renounce all the notions of religion and culture and try to enforce their self-fashioned set of ideas devoid of moral and ethical values. The derogatory and discriminatory attacks on religion under the guise of open-mindedness are equally responsible for the concurrent state of terror and chaos as are the actions of religious bigots. There is no place for change and advancement in the scripts of religious fanatics and no space for cultural, religious or moral values among the heretics in liberal costumes. Science and discovery are victimized parallel to the personal beliefs and life style of a scientist in its condemnation by an extremist while religion becomes the target of a pseudo-liberal in the pretext of condemning orthodoxy and conservatism. Religious bigots paint a heroic picture of murderers and killers in their outburst to tamp the non-conservatives. While their protagonist extremists idealize the modern societies wet in decadence and debauchery.
It’s above all obscurities that ‘sex and pleasure’ in modern societies are of the utmost prominence. All the confined concepts of ‘sexuality and sexual relationships’ have completely faded away in modern societies. Gayism, lesbianism, infidelity from unnatural to unethical every kind of corruption is found common and hypocritically justified in modern societies that these ‘liberal extremists’ idealize and brand them to be ‘civilized and advanced’.
An Urdu saying better defines this point that “Taali Kabhi Ek Hath Se Nahi Bajti”. Thus, it is apparently clear that both the ends of the story are equally wet in culpability. Religious extremists are brutish in their way of conduct while ultra-liberals are also a coterie of hypocrites that use the terms of ‘liberalism’ to get their selfish and sensual ends materialized.

(Sorry for grammatical/spelling mistakes, if any.)