AoA,

I often think about the weird recruitment policy of FPSC and PPSC especially for BS 17 and above. In the ad, they demand Masters, M.phills etc but neither their test has anything to do with the particular post nor it includes the field of discipline of candidates except 5-10 questions. Even a middle pass can cram all that G. K and get the job. It's same like our orthodox education system where we strictly adhere our students to cram the syllabus and pass the exam. By dint of it, what happens is that noncompetitive individuals get the job because they are good at cramming and those who are brilliant and have strong analytical skills fail to make it through. How can such people make the good decision for the welfare of the public in general and country particular when they are shorn of sound analytical abilities, reasoning and critical thinking? How can they test the competitiveness and intelligence of candidates with merely 100 MCQ's ? Is it a G. K quiz competition or a recruitment test for a government job ? The government has made a very good move by changing the syllabus and adding some more contemporary subjects in CSS. But, it should also make changes in provincial and federal service commission as well. There should be a descriptive and analytical test and G. K should only be given a small portion of it.

Comments needed.

Regards.