Quote:
Originally Posted by incounternable
You are again using the same logic. He did prepare or didn't prepare is not in our knowledge. He paid money to get AC slot, too, isn't in our knowledge but all we have is his CE-16 result to declare the almost whole lot(other than 70 as depicted)of CCE allocattees culprits of malpractice. That my friend is not a sound argument to support the SC verdict.
Why don't you go find profile of all the allocattees( including their CSS attempts )to know whether they really deserved to be punished like this ? Why stick to this one only ?
|
Mansoor Mitha, we are dragging this matter unnecessary and like arguing in court. we should stop this discussion and prepare for our cce13 and css exams. If we hit our head on wall, nothing will change, even neither qualifiers nor other candidates listen to hour voice. So better we should consume our time in constructive discussion
Why should we waste our time in searching their profile or their cradibility. It is better we should prepare for cce17 as well. If cce13 takes place or not, will all be same to us. Since we are not wadere ka betas, so we have to work harder.
Case is closed my lord