Quote:
Originally Posted by Sumro
i just read incounternable's argument regarding a candidate failing in 11 out of 12 papers and who unfortunately enough secured 5th position in CCE-2013, being Allocated Assistant Commissioner, in which written were conducted in April 2015. Respected Member's argument is totally biased. By calling himself a realist dost not mean he actually is.
i mean how come one person can do as best as to be on top 5 in the merit list of pcs, and, the same person fails in 11 papers and people here not only accept them but eady to defend too!
This was a one such example of malpractices committed in the said exam, let alone nepotism and favouritism. A great decision, a great precedent.
|
Go read all my posts again and do try to understand what I have been trying to say in all those posts.
JazakAllah
Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk
__________________
Hope sees the invisible, feels the intangible and achieves the impossible.
Last edited by incounternable; Wednesday, April 05, 2017 at 02:48 PM.
|