Quote:
Originally Posted by PartyPooper
The bit about not addressing the core idea was meant for Wazir. I think you have addressed it amply. The issue with your essay is that it is too philosophical and uses heavy jargon. That's the downside (perhaps the only downside, and maybe the decisive one, God forbid). I have heard professors saying that they penalise those who fail to keep essays general.
|
Thanks. How could one try to be "generalist" when there is no other option than to treat the subject with its ontological and theoretical debate using the proper terminology (condition of the discourse) and jargon ? Anyway, your feedback is encouraging. You are the only person I came know who understood this essay question. Have you appeared in CSS Exams ? Thanks