Quote:
Originally Posted by Dire Wolf
To pick right person for the right job, we have nts, pts, ots, provincial psc, fpsc mcqs based test. No need to ruin css exam. If they still think that there is a group which require person with specific knowledge, just remove it from css groups because most of the groups are general anyways and don't require specific education. Remove those 1 or 2 groups and place any other group here in civil service like intelligence (IB + FIA) or any other group which requires general exam.
Plus people who are allocated in audits and accounts or in customs would better know about the nature of job that they require persons with accounts background or not. I really doubt that they would.
|
I think they do plan on removing the more technical groups or at the very least allowing lateral entry for more trained professionals (which would then actually be on degrees and/or professional background basis). I think that would be worse since it fosters a feeling of "us" and "them". People who go through the full CSS process shall resent those that can get jobs on a higher pay scale which just one exam. It would feel like they would be cutting in line to get ahead. And as for people not requiring a background in accounts to serve the accounts group well, a nurse can learn on the job as well but I'd rather have someone who was trained in it attending me for more efficiency sake if nothing else. In any case, the civil service does need a good overhaul including the induction process. I do respect your opinion and believe you have every right to have it. Change is always hard and at most times un-welcome, but until a final form is presented we have nothing to judge upon besides some recommendation papers and pure speculation.