View Single Post
  #134  
Old Friday, September 11, 2009
AFRMS AFRMS is offline
37th Common
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: Diligent Service Medal: Awarded upon completion of 5 years of dedicated services and contribution to the community. - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,514
Thanks: 1,053
Thanked 1,681 Times in 873 Posts
AFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud of
Default Lamarckism

Lamarckism

Lamarckism
The theory of evolution as put forth by French biologist Lamarck has come to be known as Lamarckism. This theory has two salient features:

Use and Disuse of Parts

According to Lamarck, continuous use of a part results in it being well-developed and disuse of a part over a long period of time will result in its degeneration. For example, giraffes were forced to extend their necks and stretch their legs to reach higher vegetation over a period of time. This resulted in every generation having a little longer neck and legs than the previous one. Webbed feet in aquatic birds are thought to have developed due to constant spreading of toes and the stretching of the skin between. Successive generations of fish living in water pools deep inside caves in Europe have over hundreds of years lost their eyesight with eyelids becoming permanently sealed.

Inheritance of Acquired Characters
According to Lamarck, the characters that an organism acquired due to a change in their environment such as long neck, webbed feet, sealed eyes, etc. were passed on to the next generation. In this way, evolution from simpler to complex forms took place.
However, this theory was not widely accepted as it is known that acquired characters are only phenotypic changes and not genotypic. Thus, while the cases of giraffe, aquatic birds and blind fish do show that evolution has occurred, Lamarckism does not provide a satisfactory answer to the mystery of evolution.
Theory of Continuity of Germplasm
This was proposed by Weismann who did not agree with Lamarck's theory of inheritance of acquired characters. To prove his point, he cut off the tails of many successive generations of mice. This resulted in forced disuse of the tail. According to the theory of use and disuse, the tails should have become progressively shorter. However, this did not happen.
According to Weismann, the changes affected only the somatic (vegetative) cells and did not affect the germ cells or the gametes. Only the changes that affect the germ cells and the germplasm (the collection of genes) will be inherited by successive generations.



Darwinism
Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace proposed that nature has its own ways of selecting the best from the available species for continuation of life. Darwin became famous for his Theory of evolution by natural selection, the mechanism of which works as follows:
Individuals of a species produce more offspring than necessary to replace themselves.
This result in competition and struggle for existence among the individuals. Within the species, there is variation that results in minor differences between the individuals.
Thus in the struggle for existence only the ones with the variations best adapted to their environment survive.
In this manner nature ensures the 'survival of the fittest'.

Neo-Darwinism
The theory put forth by Darwin and Wallace gained wide acceptance. However, in the light of modern evidences, it was slightly modified and called Neo-Darwinism. In Neo-Darwinism, organic evolution is by natural selection of inherited characters. It utilizes evidences from various fields such as genetics, palaeontology, molecular biology, ecology and ethology (study of behaviour).


Reply With Quote