armaghan_arif and vicky786 have rightly guided you.

I would suggest you to adopt impersonal tone in a balanced approach by avoiding blunt criticism. Remain objective and present pros and cons before deciding the final fate. Provide equal chance to +ves and -ves, in the end you would be in a better position to safely land on any sound side in your conclusion.

You have to play three roles in the whole essay i.e. 1) Advocate in favor of the subject matter 2) Advocate against the subject matter 3) Judge.
Start with dual personality role (Two advocates presenting points against each other). End like a judge by announcing impartial decision based on the valid arguments of the advocates.


Regards

__________________
"Tumhary nafs ki qeemat Janat hay isy Janat say kam qeemat pey na bechna."
"Jiyo to istarh ky log tum sy milny ko tarsy; maro to istrah k log tumharee mot par royain"