View Single Post
  #8  
Old Saturday, June 26, 2010
rishzzz's Avatar
rishzzz rishzzz is offline
PMS - S&GAD
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: Css 2010 - Roll no 5865PMS / PCS Award: Serving PMS / PCS (BS 17) officers are eligible only. - Issue reason: 2011 - Merit No. 43
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lahore
Posts: 742
Thanks: 434
Thanked 752 Times in 448 Posts
rishzzz is just really nicerishzzz is just really nicerishzzz is just really nicerishzzz is just really nicerishzzz is just really nice
Default

@ shaho

Well, i don't think it is a valid position to take. Because, most of the time when an essay writer opposes the topic then examiner expects some astonishing facts with aggressive arguments, waiting for his eyes. But here you will not find any proper sorta material except 3-4 conspiracies or flaw theories.... Global warming is a proven reality based phenomenon, so you can't convince examiner and you will not even have such a huge knowledge on it to write 3000 words.

One option that you may choose is to cater the essay in its essence, describing the topic as you decided and then in order to make it a bit argumentative include some 2 odd paragraphs of these opposing theories and at the very end, means conclusion again support your main point of view without adding something new. This would surely help you. But going against Global warming will derail your impression on examiner.

Regards
__________________
“The greatest discovery of all time is that a person can change his future by merely changing his attitude.”
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rishzzz For This Useful Post:
Shaho (Saturday, June 26, 2010)