View Single Post
  #5  
Old Saturday, October 02, 2010
Ali Ahmad Syed's Avatar
Ali Ahmad Syed Ali Ahmad Syed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: In The Blessings of God
Posts: 751
Thanks: 360
Thanked 1,074 Times in 471 Posts
Ali Ahmad Syed is a splendid one to beholdAli Ahmad Syed is a splendid one to beholdAli Ahmad Syed is a splendid one to beholdAli Ahmad Syed is a splendid one to beholdAli Ahmad Syed is a splendid one to beholdAli Ahmad Syed is a splendid one to beholdAli Ahmad Syed is a splendid one to behold
Default Precis - 2009 Paper

Q.2 Make a precis of the given passage and suggest a suitable heading. (20+5)

From Plato to Tolstoi art has been accused of exciting our emotions and thus of disturbing the order and harmony of our moral life. “Poetical imagination, according to Plato, waters our experience of lust and anger, of desire and pain, and makes them grow when they ought to starve with drought. “Tolstoi sees in art a source of infection. “Not only in infection,” he says, is a sign of art, but the degree of infectiousness also the sole measure of excellence in art But the flaw in this theory is obvious.

Tolstoi suppresses a fundamental moment of art, the moment of form. The aesthetic experience – the experience of contemplation – is a different state of mind from the coolness of our theoretical and the sobriety of our moral judgment. It is filled with the liveliest energies of passion, but passion itself is here transformed both in its nature and in its meaning. Wordsworth defines poetry as “emotion recollected in tranquility”. But the tranquility we feel in great poetry is not that of recollection. The emotions aroused by the poet do not belong to a remote past. They are “here”-alive and immediate. We are aware of their full strength, but this strength tends in a new direction.
It is rather seen than immediately felt. Our passions are no longer dark and impenetrable powers; they become, as it were, transparent. Shakespeare never gives us an aesthetic theory. He does not speculate about the nature of art. Yet in the only passage in which he speaks of the character and function of dramatic art the whole stress is laid upon this point. “The purpose of playing,” as Halmet explains, “both at the first and now, was and is, to hold, as, twere, the mirror up to nature; to show virtue her own feature, scorn her own image, and the very age and body of the time his form and pressure.” But the image of a passion is not the passion itself. The poet who represents a passion does not infect us with this passion. At a Shakespeare play we are not at the mercy of these emotions; we look through them; we seem to penetrate into their very nature and essence. In this respect Shakespeare’s theory of dramatic art, if he had such a theory, is in complete agreement with the conception of the fine arts of the great painters and sculptors.

Total Words = 395

Answer

Title - Art and Passion

Both Plato and Tolstoy agreed that the art is a cause of dark passions. Tolstoy termed the art as infection. Here Tolstoy curbs the philosophical and observational experience of art which is different from morality. This is full of passion through its nature and meaning. Wordswoth termed poetry as recollected emotions in repose. But we sense the great poetry is living and fresh not recollection. By describing the functions of dramatic art Shakespeare stressed “The purpose of playing”. According to him morality and immorality have their own character. The poet or art is not responsible for dark passions. At a Shakespeare play viewers are not bound by emotions, although; they looking and penetrating through them. We could say that Shakespeare’s views of dramatic art are in complete harmony with fine art.

Precis Words = 134

Please comment
__________________
“There is no God but You (Allah Almighty), You are far exalted and above all weaknesses, and I was indeed the wrongdoer”. AL-QURAN
Reply With Quote