Seniors, check my precise of 2001!
p.s I would do the last ten years' precise as well.

Precise 2001

It was not from want of perceiving the beauty of external nature but from the different way of perceiving it, that the early Greeks did not turn their genius to portray, either in colour or in poetry, the outlines, the hues, and contrasts of all fair valley, and hold cliffs, and golden moons, and rosy lawns which their beautiful country affords in lavish abundance.

Primitive people never so far as I know, enjoy when is called the picturesque in nature, wild forests, beetling cliffs, reaches of Alpine snow are with them great hindrances to human intercourse, and difficulties in the way of agriculture. They are furthermore the homes of the enemies of mankind, of the eagle, the wolf, or the tiger, and are most dangerous in times of earthquake or tempest. Hence the grand and striking features of nature are at first looked upon with fear and dislike.

I do not suppose that Greeks different in the respect from other people, except that the frequent occurrence of mountains and forests made agriculture peculiarly difficult and intercourse scanty, thus increasing their dislike for the apparently reckless waste in nature. We have even in Homer a similar feeling as regards the sea, --- the sea that proved the source of all their wealth and the condition of most of their greatness. Before they had learned all this, they called it “the unvintagable sea” and looked upon its shore as merely so much waste land. We can, therefore, easily understand, how in the first beginning of Greek art, the representation of wild landscape would find no place, whereas, fruitful fields did not suggest themselves as more than the ordinary background. Art in those days was struggling with material nature to which it felt a certain antagonism.

There was nothing in the social circumstances of the Greeks to produce any revolution in this attitude during their greatest days. The Greek republics were small towns where the pressure of the city life was not felt. But as soon as the days of the Greeks republics were over, the men began to congregate for imperial purposes into Antioch, or Alexandria, or lastly into Rome, than we seek the effect of noise and dust and smoke and turmoil breaking out into the natural longing for rural rest and retirement so that from Alexander’s day …… We find all kinds of authors --- epic poets, lyricist, novelists and preachers --- agreeing in the precise of nature, its rich colours, and its varied sounds.


Title: The Early Realisation Of Natural Beauty in Greeks

Greeks had not portrayed the natural beauty which their country had in abundance in their early art and literature because they did not perceive it as a blessing.
The marvelous scenery of nature with wild forests and great mountains had not been enjoyed by the primitive Greek civilisation because they perceived it as a hindrance in their way to cultivation and progress. They were homes to the beasts and were worst in the times of earthquake or snow storms. Therefore, man looked at nature as a frightening entity.
It's not that Greek were different people than others but the great mountains and forests being a hindrance in cultivation made them despise the beauty of nature. The similar kind of feeling is found in Homer about sea, where its shore is seen as a waste land, though later on the same sea proved to be a source of wealth and progress for them. Therefore, nature had no place in early Greek art and was regarded with an air of contempt.
There was nothing in Greek society to bring change about their perception about natural beauty. But when Greeks started mobilising from the countryside to the urban areas like Antioch, Alexandria and Rome for their material purposes, they experienced dust, noise and smoke. This made them long for the peace rural areas offered to them and hence, the Greek scholars and artists started agreeing with the importance of natural beauty and its various tones.