If you say revolution is an abrupt change and still you are saying pakistan movement was a revolution then you should say Bangladesh appearing on the map of the world, Muslim central asian states, Ireland an all states who got independence were due to revolution....If so then kindly elaborate..... Czi dont term an independence movement as revolution as i already have specified in previous post what a revolution is!!

The revolution you highlighted still speaking of themselves as independence movement....
1.Ireland got independence from Britain and Bangladesh from Pakistan.now Baluchi are working on the same tune..
Evolution rated sustainable changes and revolution converse of it.if i said the social change which came due to partition is evolution than why that did not sustained after Quaid..

2.if you are saying its not a change than it would be injustice to social change itself..

3.you mentioned after 1940s its only an ideological change..than Bolshevik revolution was too an ideological change...
4..Iranian white revolution is only concerned about economic system and shah was remained as a monarch..than what would be that change..
5.Iranian Islamic revolution is revolved around religious ideology..than what is that change?