Following are the few of the charges on the basis of which case against mal-practices in CCE 2008 is prepared. Few of those which are known to me are following:

1) The unprecedented delay in issuing the mark sheets of unsuccessful candidates. This act of SPSC has made the whole process dubious. The mark sheets which have been obtained by petitioners or provided to them by indirect sources have significant variations. Those who got excellent marks in written parts have been given marks in very odd pattern such as 119.75, 121.50 & 123 out of maximum. Those who are said to be influential even scoring pathetic in written achieved remarkable marks such as 230 and even 235 out of 250. These mark sheets will be provided to the court in later stages when all candidates will be given mark sheets formally by SPSC.

2) Petitioners also raised a point that SPSC announced the final allocation before delivering mark sheets. This has snatched their right of RECOUNTING which is against the rules of SPSC. As per their lawyer this act of SPSC shows mala-fide intentions as to why they are hiding the marks obtained by candidates in written as well interviews. If any counting/calculation mistake happened in individual paper affecting the final % needed for allocation than how this candidate/s will be repaid as allocations are already made.

3) The significant issue of SPSC employees or blood relatives of employees attempting CCE 2008 without being relieved from the duties pertaining to the examination or can influence the examination process. The following two points were stressed in the case.

a) Knowing the fact that brother of controller examination has applied for the examination and appeared in the same. The SPSC failed to separate the said official from the examination process. After his brother’s allocation SPSC on hue and cry of media said Mr. Shah not the part of it but unfortunately the fact is bit different as he was thoroughly involved in distribution of papers to the teachers of his choice, supervising the exams, making inspections in different exam centers. Petitioners are also asking that If he was not there than who else replaced him as all documents are signed by Mr. Shah in the said period even result was announced with his signature. The extreme of informality and unprofessional attitude of SPSC as they said Mr. Shah was not their and results are being announced written and interview with his signature. The evidences to prove this fact was gathered by petitioners and will be presented in the court and remaining investigation will be done by courts itself in future.

b) Another employee of SPSC is also nominated in the said case as he also succeeded in getting allocation. He also proved to be allowed to attempt CCE 2008 without fulfilling basic formalities. This person is still on the pay roll of SPSC and since the start of examination process was involved in the computer section that has a basic responsibility pertains to secrecy of information.

c) A testimony of a retired professor who received the exam copies from Mr. Shah will be produced as process of court moves along. I don’t know who has prepared this professor to be presented in court at least petitioners don’t have this capacity to do that. Someone else is continuously helping them to arrange credible evidences.

4) The petitioners who missed the exam due to revised time table and lodged the petitions in High court and than Supreme court are also claimed to be the part of same petition against CCE 2008 or file a separate case in later months as they came to know from sources within SPSC that their exam copies of Civil law or some other course were checked by a teacher of history and the same teacher is not on the list of examiners SPSC. This shows the anger of SPSC on candidates as to why they moved Sindh High Court and than Supreme Court.



The lawyer of this case has assured the petitioners that he will go all out to prove above points and persuade court to probe into these matters. He further said that this case like wise CCE 2003 pertains to procedural mal-practices and will be decided in future in a year or two. Once the court takes up the matter than it will be the responsibility of the court to ask concerned authorities to produce evidences and ask Anti Corruption to dig out the same in future.

I have already made it clear to the concerned that this case is of similar nature as the case of CCE 2003 lodged by Mr. Saleem Shiekh.
We can safely say that after 7 to 8 years of long struggle CCE 2003 case is near to its maturity and first step in this regard has been taken as EX-Controller examination was arrested and sentenced. Further more the requisition to take further action against culprit is pending at the end of Chief Secretary. The court who has trialed and punished Ex- controller examination is asking in last two petitions that what has govt. authorities done in this regard. The time will come and court order Sindh Govt. to dislodge all officers proved guilty of mal-practices. Kuch logon ko mein personally janta hun who bilkul bhi guilty nahin per unfortunately their names are in the list and will face the burnt of exodus as they have sacrificed superb careers for Sindh Govt. jobs.

There are four groups of petitioners in this case. Some has lodged the case with their observations and remaining are waiting and will lodge the case with their allegations in future. All are willing to take this case till Supreme Court if not decided in Sindh High Court. As I already said if these cases are lodged in court with above allegation than future setups of Govt. and SPSCs will strengthen the case. CCE 2003 case was not at all strengthened and consoliated by Mr. Saleem Shiekh rather SPSC setups with the help of Governments has done all this karishma as the ex-controller examination is arrested and enquiry report recommending severe step against named people is recommended. Unfortunately CCE 2008 is on same path.

Meritorious people will be de motivate by these facts but this how governance is being run in our province. These petitioners are independent to go into court and if it hurts us this doesn't make any difference for them I will post any other information received in future through same sources who intimated me above points