HRCP’s State of Human Rights 2010 report
April 16th, 2011
In the coming days, it is probable that media attention on the annual report of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) will be directed at a few predictable targets. The HRCP’s State of Human Rights 2010 report provides exact figures regarding many items that are currently making headlines. It tells us, for example, that 957 people were killed last year in US drone strikes while another 1,159 people were killed in suicide terrorist attacks. With ISI chief Ahmed Shuja Pasha recently complaining to his CIA counterpart Leon Panetta that the number of civilians being killed in drone attacks was actually feeding terrorism, it is useful to know that drone attacks have killed nearly as many people as terrorist attacks themselves.
The HRCP report also states that in the last calendar year, 99 members of the Ahmadi community were killed while 64 people were charged with blasphemy, out of which three were killed in police custody. But the most lives were taken by sectarian violence between Muslims as 418 people, mostly Shia, were killed in violence between different Muslim sects. Once again, the fact that the Ahmadi community is facing unparalleled discrimination, that the blasphemy laws are being misused and that Pakistan is beset by sectarian violence should not come as news to anyone, but the work done by the HRCP shows the extent of the rot in society. These are issues that have been in the news recently and the HRCP report gives some statistical basis to buttress that coverage.
It is all well and fine to discuss and be outraged by these statistics. However, it would be doing a disservice to the work put in by the HRCP not to focus on some of the more neglected human rights abuses they have documented. The province of Balochistan, as always, tends to be overlooked, both by the central government and the media. While there has been a lot of hue and cry over target killings in Karachi, the HRCP report points out that there were 117 such incidents in Balochistan. Additionally, the migration of repressed Hindus out of Balochistan, a province that once had a reputation for being friendly to minorities, has also been mentioned. It is essential to educate ourselves about these facts since the government, after announcing a much-hyped plan for bringing peace to Balochistan, seems to have put the issue to one side.
The report also uses harsh words for the structural flaws in the political system in the country. While praising the government for the passage of the 18th and 19th Amendments, it noted that legislation had become difficult to pass thanks to inaction by the Senate. Mentioning the extensive use of suo motu notice by the judiciary, the report also seemed to implicitly criticise the political parties for not taking action and thereby forcing the judiciary to take note of corruption and inefficiencies. The HRCP also pointed out that our prisons are filled to nearly double their sanctioned capacity, while the frequent use of the death penalty means that there are nearly 8,000 prisoners on death row. These point to a breakdown on almost all levels of government and society.
Women’s rights, too, seem to have taken a back seat last year. Thanks to the lethargy of the Senate, the Domestic Violence Bill was allowed to lapse while sections of the Protection of Women Act were nullified by the Federal Shariat Court. Rape and honour killings continue unpunished while women parliamentarians, who are most likely to speak out on these issues, are sidelined mainly because most of them were chosen on reserved seats.
Ultimately, the HRCP report has not made any startling disclosures. All the problems it has mentioned are those we know about and mostly chose to ignore. Its immense value lies in the meticulous research the group has done to show us exactly how bad the state of human rights in Pakistan is by giving us exact numbers.
Realities of revolution
April 16th, 2011
The unexpected call given by philanthropist Abdul Sattar Edhi for a “bloody revolution” in the country during a talk in Karachi indicates the extent to which frustration and desperation has seeped into our society. Edhi, a man known for the gentleness of his nature and his enormous compassion, would normally be the last person expected to urge a violent uprising of any kind. But it appears that more and more people in our nation are becoming convinced that this is the only way to bring about change. Recent events in the Middle East obviously influence the thinking and mindset of many.
To his credit, Edhi made it clear he did not seek a curtailment of the government’s term. He also spoke out against the misuse of funds by many different categories of people, including politicians, and stated that a time may come when citizens needed to take matters into their own hands. The views expressed by Edhi also indicate a growing tussle with despondency. While he himself suggested hard work as a means to move beyond this, the fact is that most people lack the capacity to dedicate themselves to others the way Edhi has done for so many decades. Ways need to be found to alleviate their suffering — and there is indeed a risk that if this does not happen, things may spiral out of control.
We should keep in mind that things are becoming more and more urgent by the day. Even though revolutions are being painted as a desirable event by many, they are in reality often unpredictable, messy affairs which can end in uncertain ways. In our particular situation, the presence of a well-armed force like the Taliban makes this all the more true. Other solutions need to be found. The call by Edhi should act as a warning of how dangerous things are becoming, compelling even the most tolerant and clear-thinking of persons to consider the possibility that solutions may lie only in an upheaval which dramatically changes the order of things and the lives of people who face incredibly tough circumstances.