Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinky2
Dear Hamza_salick86,
i know what "either" means...and he hasnt used either in the sense u are assuming it to be, i.e either pakistan gave him permission to hide or else Pakistan had no idea that he was here...his argument isnt quite that lousy *scoffs*......he didnt use "either" and "or" for these two scenarios..instead he used these two for two synonymous expressions ; either Pakistan is an incompetent state or a rogue state hiding the most most dangerous terrorist in its territory
so kindly read his entry again and plz admit that i was right and you were wrong..
he is entitled to his own opinion but this one was devoid of logic..
PS:in case u havnt noticed he himself has nothing to say about my logical rebuttal....classic case of Muddai sust, Gawah Chust |
Excuse me, but I am compelled to bring to your kind attention that either you have problem understanding english or you don't really want to understand.
If you disagree with the above, kindly Explain How is it not logical for a neutral person to come to the conclusion that either Pakistan was intentionally hiding OBL (Makes them a rogue state) or They really did not know he was there and had no Idea of the raid by usa (makes them an incompetent state). Please Elaborate with what you call "Logic" how is this conclusion wrong to draw because I find it very logical and understandable. The only thing required is thinking out of the box and not being emotional