View Single Post
  #4  
Old Sunday, May 15, 2011
Waqar Abro's Avatar
Waqar Abro Waqar Abro is offline
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sirius Star
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 569
Thanked 1,049 Times in 524 Posts
Waqar Abro has much to be proud ofWaqar Abro has much to be proud ofWaqar Abro has much to be proud ofWaqar Abro has much to be proud ofWaqar Abro has much to be proud ofWaqar Abro has much to be proud ofWaqar Abro has much to be proud ofWaqar Abro has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aariz View Post
I am wondering over the pattern of the CSS exam after going through complete definition of the word COMPETITION. In short, All CSS candidates appear in compulsory papers and they have choice in optional subbjects. A competition is held under a particular and unique course for all aspirants. The phenomenon of choosing optional subjects, in fact, distorts the meaning of the competition. It is a discrimination for a hardworking student who does not opt Arabic and other high scoring subjects though he has not aptitude of the subjects. On the other side, some subjects are declared low scoring. The result of Islamic History 2010 is the best example.
What do you think?

Regards
Aariz Memon
I endorse you.

This is not a competition but discrimination.
A candidate,luckily opts high scoring subjects may be awarded more marks than others,shows clearly that there is no crystal clear system of awarding marks.
Owing to this,many competent Csps allocated in unexpected groups.
This high and low scoring trend must be abolished.

Regards
__________________
You are an eagle, flight is your vocation:
You have other skies stretching out before you.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Waqar Abro For This Useful Post:
aariz (Sunday, May 15, 2011), Hamza Salick (Sunday, May 15, 2011)