Quote:
Originally Posted by aariz
I am wondering over the pattern of the CSS exam after going through complete definition of the word COMPETITION. In short, All CSS candidates appear in compulsory papers and they have choice in optional subbjects. A competition is held under a particular and unique course for all aspirants. The phenomenon of choosing optional subjects, in fact, distorts the meaning of the competition. It is a discrimination for a hardworking student who does not opt Arabic and other high scoring subjects though he has not aptitude of the subjects. On the other side, some subjects are declared low scoring. The result of Islamic History 2010 is the best example.
What do you think?
Regards
Aariz Memon
|
I endorse you.
This is not a competition but discrimination.
A candidate,luckily opts high scoring subjects may be awarded more marks than others,shows clearly that there is no crystal clear system of awarding marks.
Owing to this,many competent Csps allocated in unexpected groups.
This high and low scoring trend must be abolished.
Regards