fromQAU is right. Generally, in expansion, one should give as balanced opinion as possible. The topic could be analyzed from multiple angles, I mean in such topics, the issue can be viewed from two extreme point of views. So I think, in the beginning, we should shed light on both the angles, describe the duality inherent in the issue, and then give our concluding opinion which should be left balanced (Like you wrote on internet), or at most only a little bit tilted towards one point of view, if you feel that to be more important.

Grammar is good !

__________________
39th CTP - IRS