Quote:
Originally Posted by kaleem1
dears only one thing can give us evidence it was to compare the DMCs of pass candidates with our own DMCs if pass candidate has low score in written but they given high marks than 80% in interview than it is the proof that they are given full marks to a weak candidate there is some thing behind this high scoring the only benefit of this protest will transparent the future up coming selection process of commission examination but i heard from a person working in commission office that chairman issued order that the DMCs of pass candidate will not be show to any one even pass candidate can not see their own DMC what is the reason behind this order >???????????????????????/  it is clear that the protest will give the selection process cear in the next exam other wise we will see the same result |
sir this is generally happening in almost all the four provincial commissions sometimes you get something and most of the time you dont...but still i believe an effect protest can change anything
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xeric
Interview panel has discretionary powers while awarding interview marks. You can't blame them on the grounds that there is discrimination in marking on legal grounds. Panel has power even to fail someone or give ZERO according the the performance of candidate. It is very hard to defeat the decision of interview panel in the court of law.
|
you are right madam its almost impossible to revoke interview panel's decisions because you dont have any proof to do so