View Single Post
  #18  
Old Sunday, June 26, 2011
shtanzeel's Avatar
shtanzeel shtanzeel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lahore
Posts: 354
Thanks: 215
Thanked 228 Times in 157 Posts
shtanzeel will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjkhan View Post
yes indeed economic performance was much better in dictatorship than in democracy but why?

1.how can military cycle significantly impacts the growth process?

2.how military cycle significantly impacts the growth process?

3.what was the main reason for the boom in economy in musharafz era?
For Q. No. 1 & 2. Theres a latest thesis of M.Phil, for Pakistan, which has used data and checked for presence of Political & Military cycle. That has found military cycle as positively and significantly affecting growth using ARDL bounds testing approach. Plus there are hundreds of papers in world over military cycle and growth.

Q. No. 3, excessive credit issuance. Musharraf era growth was a disaster indeed in the Long Run. I am highly appreciable of Ayub era growth. Please see performance in 1950's and compare with 60's. Its eye opening. Leave it aside, after zia, in 1990's what our politicians/democratic setup did of our economy, a glance at the macro indicators would testify my statement.
__________________
Economist.....
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to shtanzeel For This Useful Post:
Ali Ahmad Syed (Sunday, June 26, 2011), candidguy (Sunday, June 26, 2011), SADIA SHAFIQ (Sunday, June 26, 2011)