Quote:
Originally Posted by Usman Cheema
Have you people ever read "Hummod ur Rehman commission report" besides a lot of other available literature about the Bangladesh debacle? My suggestion to you is that please do some homework before just jumping into the discussions.
Regards,
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mukt
With all due respect may I ask was it whom you call "ZAB" who asked the army to surrender? Was It Zab who ordered the army to indulge in raping women and killing civilians? Was It zab who planned and executed all sort of war crimes In what we now know as bangladesh? I would be glad and delighted If you answer
|
The political history of Pakistan from 1947 to 1970 witnessed no general elections. Thus, when Yahya's Regime decided to hold the first general elections on the basis of adult franchise at national level, they were not only required to make a new mechanism but were also required to set up a permanent election machinery.Twenty four political parties participated in the elections. They were allowed to begin their election campaigns from January 1, 1970. The public meetings of Awami League in Bengal and Pakistan Peoples Party in the Punjab and Sindh attracted huge crowds. Awami League mobilized support on the basis of its Six-Points Program, which was the main attraction in the party's manifesto. While Z. A. Bhutto's personality, his socialistic ideas and his slogan of "Rotti, Kapra aur Makan", meaning food, clothing and shelter, were the factors that contributed to the popularity of Pakistan Peoples Party. The rightist parties raised the religious slogans, while the leftists raised slogans based on regional and communistic ideas.
why mujib and zia could not reconciled??
- zulfiqar ali bhutto was socialist and his aim was to established socilaist regime that was based on the true model of USSR WHRER AS mujib wanted to parliamentary system ---- a true and pure form of democarcy .i wonder why people side zulfiqar ? Just bevause he was a civillian dictator....
- what was the problem if defense and and foreign affairs would be in the hand of federal govt and it was divided into confederation .At least we would have no begladesh
- economic disparities and cultural deprivation which had ignited the public of east pakistan at that time
next come to the general election mujib got major votes in west pakistan and zulfiqar got them in east pakistan .operation search light was carried out in in i971 whera as genaral elections were happened in 1970s. at that time mujib ur rehamn thrice invited zulfiqar and yahya for amicable solution .but ZAB was`nt ready for that .aaj agar zulfiqat etny sakhty and raaaoonat na dikhatey to bengladesh hamarey paas hooota .uno ne kaha tha me tangen toor dun ga jo assembly ke ticket par bengladesh gaya
as far as hamood ur rehman commission is concerned there are many versions of it,its first version was published by india. the fact is intestin why india published it first ..hamood was bengladeshi then why bengladesh govt did not published it first .`THis Commission was only assaigned to present army attroticies which they did in east pakistan? why it did not collected any findings /facts which bengladeshi people had done with their other pakistani brethern esp. belonging to west pakistan
@usman chemaa thanks 4 ur nice and valuable advise.Is it the rule of this forum ,one should have home work then jump into discussion.this forum is for leaning ,not giving a shut up call .
@mukt than for addressing me with respect ..army what did in bengladesh (true or false ) was the last incident of yhis whole story