Judiciary is interfering in the authority of executive and the parliament. Our suo motto CJ strike down the promotion of 54 bureaucrats then why didn't he take action on the incidence of 12 may,on the extension of Army chief and ISI chief.In the verdict of Deedar Hussain's case it was mentioned by SC that CJ should also be consulted in the nomination process of NAB chairman.That was not the business of SC.
No doubt our executive are incompetent and insincere but our parliament is the owner of constitution.SC is infact a custodian but ownership is more sovereign than custodian so SC should accept its sovereignty.
Moreover, the supremacy of SC would be accepted if executive wants the implementation of its decisions.As the US president,Andrew Jackson,had rightly said that" Marshal has given his decision,let him enforce it" in the case of 'Cherokee VS State.'
Kindly comment