Thursday, August 25, 2011
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Karachi
Posts: 756
Thanks: 439
Thanked 446 Times in 319 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saba mehmood
Mujhy 14 points or Nehru Report pe critical analysis me problem ho rhi h,aor in k comparison me bhi Please helpm in solving this topic.
With regards
|
The main difference between the nehru report and jinnah points was that Nehru report focused on addressing the issues related to hindus whereas jinnah points focused on addressing the issues related to muslims. Jinnah points demanded separate rights for muslims which were left ignored in Nehru report. Jinnah demanded the separate electorate rights for muslims. He demanded that muslim majority areas should be given a separate status Jinnah suggested that sindh should be separated from the Bombay presidency. Hence Jinnah points were for the protection of rights of muslims and Nehru report failed to address the rights of muslims. A comparison of the Nehru Report with the Quaid-e-Azam’s fourteen points shows that the political gap between the Muslims and the Hindus had really widened. Fourteen points of Quaid-e-Azam became principles for the Muslims of India. The importance of these points can be judged by the fact that these points were presented in the Round Table Conference of 1930. As a result, these points became the demands of the Muslims and greatly influenced the Muslims thinking for the next two decades till the establishment of Pakistan in 1947
..
__________________
Try not to become a man of success but a man of value.
|