i m not really sure anymore.. when i wz writing 4-5 pages per question, i thought the length was fine.. but after discussing the experience with other candidates, i realized that my length was below average..
waisay i personally believe that if its based on quality material, then length shouldn't be a problem in majority cases..

but what about questions where more is definitely better.. like i think in sociology paper, there was a question on causes of drug abuse in pakistan.. i could only manage 7-8 causes, but people with faster writing speeds were able to pen down 15-20 causes..
now from examiner's point of view.. if he compares both answers, and assuming the quality of writing material is equal in both cases, wouldn't he be giving more marks to the answer that sheds light on a large variety of causes??