Friday, October 21, 2011
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crumbling Prison of Cruel Customs
Posts: 1,158
Thanks: 1,185
Thanked 1,807 Times in 836 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sajidnuml
It means you rebel against the universally accepted principles: rule by consent and law. For Qadafi's rule was devoid both of law and consent. 2ndly those who stood against Qadafi are Muslims too, they demanded their rights, which you seem to enjoy in your own country. NATO's role is condemnable no doubt, but had Qadafi agreed to the peoples' demands, NATO would not have the chance to intervene. Qadafi could have put forward a road map for running the affairs of government in future, he could have held general elections, he could have empowered his people by stepping down. His outright rejection of everything hastened his fall and finally death. Why on earth we have such heroes who chain their people, deny freedom and fundamental rights to the people, and kill their people at will. These heroes of stone age must go, instead just law should reign.
|
Lolz bahi sahb ap ya BBC r Guardian ki parhi hoi stories kahin aur quote krain . for your kind information I am not a pro-democracy person so don't tell me these so called civil rights and freedom type myths which are only bestowed upon mighty and powerful people. the common people don't have anything to do with these things. and yes! you are right , I rebelled , I always rebelled against those rules which are only implicated to lay men and the status quo is always exempted from those rules. and for Nato thing , its my humble request to read some good stuff and you will better know where it intervened and for whom Nato works??
__________________
Sangdil Riwajoon ki ya Imart-e-Kohna Toot bhi Tou Skti hay
Yeh Aseer Sehzadi Choot bhi tou Skti hay
|