View Single Post
  #18  
Old Friday, January 27, 2012
zuhaib ahmed's Avatar
zuhaib ahmed zuhaib ahmed is offline
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lahore
Posts: 1,080
Thanks: 1,226
Thanked 1,992 Times in 631 Posts
zuhaib ahmed has much to be proud ofzuhaib ahmed has much to be proud ofzuhaib ahmed has much to be proud ofzuhaib ahmed has much to be proud ofzuhaib ahmed has much to be proud ofzuhaib ahmed has much to be proud ofzuhaib ahmed has much to be proud ofzuhaib ahmed has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amigo View Post
I know it isn't a universal truth balke bohat se laug to shaaid es ko simply truth bhi na maantey hon What I wanted to say was ke writer has dealt with it as an "established fact".

e.g. He said, "I was born on 1st January, 1990."
He said that he was born on 1st January, 1990.
OR
He said that he had been born on 1st January, 1990.

What do you say? Rules say option 2 is right but I think 1st one is more commendable as there must be some exceptions to this rule as well.
Yes, same; i have been asking. What is wrong if i had not add HAD?
Reply With Quote