View Single Post
  #1  
Old Thursday, July 12, 2012
assassin007's Avatar
assassin007 assassin007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 109
Thanks: 5
Thanked 42 Times in 28 Posts
assassin007 is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb Contempt of court bill 2012

And here it goes. . the bill has been approved by both senate and the parliament house.Under which, if an accused or convict of contempt of court files an appeal, his/her show-cause notice or original order will remain suspended till final disposal of the matter.

The law also states: “An accused person may also at any stage submit an apology and the court, if satisfied, may discharge him or remit his sentence.”

The bill was passed by Senate on Wednesday after being earlier approved by the National Assembly on Monday amid protest from opposition lawmakers.

A couple of petitioners have already challenged the law in the apex court, terming it a mala fide act on the part of the government against the judiciary. Most legal experts are of the view the Supreme Court wouldn’t look at it favourably.

The bill states: “A true averment made in good faith and temperate language for initiation of action or in the course of disciplinary proceedings against a judge, before the chief justices of the Supreme Court and high courts, the Supreme Judicial Council and the federal or provincial governments, shall not amount to contempt of court.”

The new law also has an overriding effect and the erstwhile Contempt of Court Act 1976 and the contempt of court ordinances 2003 and 2004 will stand repealed after its passage from Parliament and signature by the President.

Besides protecting powers and performance of holders of public office mentioned in Article 248 of the Constitution, which include the president, prime minister, governors, chief ministers, federal and state ministers, the proposed contempt of court act 2012 also shields ‘any authority’ against the contempt charges.

One of its clauses reads as “remarks made in an administrative capacity by any authority in the course of official business, including those in connection with a disciplinary inquiry or in an inspection note or a character roll or confidential” shall not amount to contempt of court.

The above clauses are an addition in the bill so what do you guys think about it?? Will it will prevail in future or not?? Over to ya fellas. .
__________________
Dekha hai aino'n ko paseene se tarba tar. . .
Ya Rab! haqeeqato'n se koi aashna na ho. . .
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to assassin007 For This Useful Post:
Irtika (Friday, July 13, 2012), Malik Nadeem 06 (Friday, July 13, 2012), saeed ullah (Friday, July 13, 2012), Samee Khan (Thursday, July 12, 2012)