View Single Post
  #421  
Old Thursday, August 09, 2012
Storm's Avatar
Storm Storm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Karachi
Posts: 134
Thanks: 36
Thanked 26 Times in 14 Posts
Storm is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch Bilal View Post
Patience please!

39132772 Aamir Gill Assistant Director (BPS-17) 47

People this person is a friend of mine, a day before the psychological test held on 4th August he got a call from NAB official apologizing that he has been mistakenly shortlisted for psychological test, on 4th August he was there for the test but was not allowed to appear & there were 3 to 4 more guys with same problem. I was there for AD Psychological test.

NAB or NTS has not done anything wrong, any or some of the candidates who were not allowed to appear in psychological test on 4th of August has filed a petition against competent authority. So, the test to be held on 12th of August is for above mentioned candidates & it is authentic.
Have faith, stay blessed!
Can you tell us before which "competent authority" this petition you speak of was filed? Do you have any evidence to back up your statement regarding this petition? What were the reasons that NAB did not allow these candidates to take the psychological test on 4th August, 2012? Why did this "competent authority" not consider this fact that the test has already been conducted and that those candidates who have already taken the test on 4th August would be aggrieved if they allowed these candidates to take the test on 12th August again? Doesn't this "competent authority" care that allowing these candidates to sit the test puts them in a better position than those who have already been through the test? Everyone has got Internet access in this age. Maybe a few people who have been called on 12th August to take the test have already been on this forum and seen the paper which we discussed in great detail following the exam.

Leave everything aside! How can you say the test is authentic when the list of candidates for the test on 12th August also includes those people whose names were also mentioned in the test conducted on 4th August? Surely, their names were already shortlisted for the 4th August test so this contradicts your statement when you said "NAB did not allow these people to appear for the test". Why is NAB giving these people a second chance when they did not appear on 4th August?

I don't want to argue with you but when you make a claim that something is authentic, please provide us with credible proof with regard to your claim...

Thanks.