Quote:
Originally Posted by khuhro
I said Authenticated INFORMATION not the knowledge or point of view of various person's. For point of views and consequence I suggested pakcolumnist. (i think you did not read or comprehend my full post). Information, like dates, event, conferences, and various information regarding different countries, is much reliable on wikipedia.
|
I am also talking about the authentication of information, no one's views may be regarded as authentic, its the information that can be called as authentic, wikipedia not as authentic as you are saying. As its facts/dates/events can be added or edited by any one so its difficult to ensure authenticity. Hope you you got my point now.