Quote:
Originally Posted by lahorizen
If it is true what MirUsma is saying,then this whole procedure is flawed because there was no use of calling so many candidates for the psychological,only 20% of the top scorers should have been called for the psychological and and only 15% should have been called for the interview.
I seriously doubt it.i seriously also doubt that all those who are required to submit the documents have visa for the interview.My experience is never a percentage is fixed i.e this much percentage of candidates are called for the interview,only no of candidates per seat are called for example two/three candidates per seat and they are also top candidates in written exam.then marks obtained in different exercises are totaled usually given a weightage for example written and psychological may have 50% of the weightage Academic record 25% interview 25% and total marks are obtained after totaling on a scale of 100.
It can be 1.5 multiplied by number of each quota seat but it can never be 15% of the total.
|
i hope you're right! i really wish im wrong but that's what i was told.
__________________
Reason has always existed, but not always in a reasonable form - Marx
|