Thursday, March 28, 2013
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lahore,Multan and Islamabad
Posts: 416
Thanks: 23
Thanked 470 Times in 277 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alee chandio
Dear Sir's, Mr.Stunner & Shah
I am agreed with both answers and same were also in my mind which were given to scholar, and he also satisfied but he required a reference or any Ruling that “such amendment which will be in repugnant to the injunction of Islam would not be amended at any cost...”
Your guidance will be highly appreciated. Thanks
|
scholar you are reffering might claim his wisdom on these sections
239(5) No amendment of the Constitution shall be called in question in any court on any ground whatsoever.
239(6) For the removal of doubt, it is hereby declared that there is no limitation whatever on the power of Majlis-e-Shoora to ammend any of the provisions of the Constitution
NOTE:239(6) any of the provision of constitution
now to prove our point
first step you know what preamble says now
2(A)The principles and provisions set out in the Objectives Resolution reproduced in the Annex are hereby made substantive part of the Constitution and shall have effect accordingly.
means that without this constitution is meaningless and when soul is missing than the constitution is not amended but altered into new one so difference between amendment and alteration should be distinguished Majlis-e-Shoora can amend it but not the soul because in simple words you can change your outlook but not your soul....
to add one more point
and if we suppose that all the disloyals of Islam are gathered in parliament even than they cannot change it because it is unconstitutional act to change preamble without which it is not the constitution of 1973 rather a new one which is impossible in modern statas of society...by the way according to sec6 there is a high treason for unconstitutional amendment or alteration....and again soul cannot be amended  stay blessed
|